Difference between revisions of "The Bible/Open canon vs. closed canon"

m (FAIR wiki articles)
m (Criticism)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{draft}}
 
{{draft}}
 
==Criticism==
 
==Criticism==
A brief explanation of the criticism.
+
Critics claim that the Church is in error because Christianity requires a "closed canon" (no more authoritative revelation) instead of the Church's "open canon" (potential for more binding revelation).
  
 
===Source(s) of the Criticism===
 
===Source(s) of the Criticism===
*
+
*Luke P. Wilson, “Lost Books & Latter-Day Revelation:  A Response to Mormon Views of the New Testament Canon,” ''Christian Research Journal'' (Fall 1996): 27–33.
  
 
==Response==  
 
==Response==  

Revision as of 23:19, 15 November 2005

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

Criticism

Critics claim that the Church is in error because Christianity requires a "closed canon" (no more authoritative revelation) instead of the Church's "open canon" (potential for more binding revelation).

Source(s) of the Criticism

  • Luke P. Wilson, “Lost Books & Latter-Day Revelation: A Response to Mormon Views of the New Testament Canon,” Christian Research Journal (Fall 1996): 27–33.

Response

The response should be brief and summary in nature.

Conclusion

A summary of the argument against the criticism.

Further reading

FAIR wiki articles

FAIR web site

External links

  • Links to external web pages

Printed material

  • Alan Denison & D.L. Barksdale, Gues Who Wants To Have You For Lunch?, 2nd edition, (Redding, California: FAIR, 2002[1999]), 37–57. ISBN 1893036057.FAIR