Difference between revisions of "Joseph Smith/Polygamy/Essays/Illegal marriages in Ohio"

m
m
Line 20: Line 20:
 
{{:Question: Did Joseph Smith violate marriage laws in Ohio by performing marriages?}}
 
{{:Question: Did Joseph Smith violate marriage laws in Ohio by performing marriages?}}
 
{{:Question: When Joseph Smith performed the marriage of Newel Knight and Lydia Bailey, were they guilty of bigamy since Lydia had not been formally divorced from her previous husband?}}
 
{{:Question: When Joseph Smith performed the marriage of Newel Knight and Lydia Bailey, were they guilty of bigamy since Lydia had not been formally divorced from her previous husband?}}
{{More|Mormonism and polygamy/1835 Doctrine and Covenants denies polygamy|l1=D&C 1835 edition, Section CI denies polygamy}}
+
{{More|Mormonism and polygamy/1835 Doctrine and Covenants denies polygamy|l1=D&C 1835 edition, Section CI denies polygamy|Latter-day_Saints_and_divorce_in_the_nineteenth_century|l2-Latter-day Saints and divorce in the 19th century}}
 
 
==See also==
 
{{:Latter-day_Saints_and_divorce_in_the_nineteenth_century}}
 
 
{{CriticalSources}}
 
{{CriticalSources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}

Revision as of 20:23, 17 March 2024

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Articles about Plural marriage
Doctrinal foundation of plural marriage
Introduction of plural marriage
Plural marriage in Utah
End of plural marriage

Joseph Smith's performance of marriages in Ohio

Joseph Smith's performance of marriages in Ohio

Summary: Critics charge that Joseph Smith performed monogamous marriages for time of already-married members, violating Ohio law in Kirtland. Such claims are false and represent a misunderstanding about the marriage and divorce law of the day.


Jump to details:

  1. REDIRECTPlural marriage and the law
  2. REDIRECTPlural marriage and the law

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here

Notes