FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Question: Was “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage?"
SpencerMarsh (talk | contribs) (→Question: Was “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage?) |
|||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==Question: Was “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage?== | ==Question: Was “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage?== | ||
===It seems that it is true that these legal concerns played a role but it does not appear that they played the only role.=== | ===It seems that it is true that these legal concerns played a role but it does not appear that they played the only role.=== | ||
| − | It is claimed by some that “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” was drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage. This | + | It is claimed by some that “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” was drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage. This is partially true. |
| + | |||
| + | The Hawaii Supreme Court began hearing a case on gay marriage known as Baehr v. Lewin (later "Miike") in 1993. A year after this, members of the Quorum of the Twelve began to draft what we know today as the Family Proclamation. The Family Proclamation was included as an appendix to the amicus curiae brief filed in Baehr v. Miike in 1997. | ||
| + | |||
| + | It was a surprise to some who thought the doctrinal truths about marriage and the family were well understood without restatement. Nevertheless, we felt the confirmation and we went to work. Subjects were identified and discussed by members of the Quorum of the Twelve for nearly a year. Language was proposed, reviewed, and revised. Prayerfully we continually pleaded with the Lord for His inspiration on what we should say and how we should say it. We all learned “line upon line, precept upon precept,” as the Lord has promised (D&C 98:12). During this revelatory process, a proposed text was presented to the First Presidency, who oversee and promulgate Church teachings and doctrine. | ||
| + | DHO offers an account of the Proclamation | ||
| + | |||
| + | |||
<!-- Hiding the introductory references to Rational Faiths - Trevor | <!-- Hiding the introductory references to Rational Faiths - Trevor | ||
Revision as of 17:05, 2 September 2021
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Contents
- 1 Question: Was “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage?
- 1.1 It seems that it is true that these legal concerns played a role but it does not appear that they played the only role.
- 1.2 Boyd K. Packer gives additional context
- 1.3 The doctrines have long been taught by the Church
- 1.4 Many of the revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants started out as similar documents
Question: Was “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage?
It seems that it is true that these legal concerns played a role but it does not appear that they played the only role.
It is claimed by some that “The Family: A Proclamation to the World” was drafted by lawyers in Hawaii in response to legal concerns the Church had over the legalization of gay marriage. This is partially true.
The Hawaii Supreme Court began hearing a case on gay marriage known as Baehr v. Lewin (later "Miike") in 1993. A year after this, members of the Quorum of the Twelve began to draft what we know today as the Family Proclamation. The Family Proclamation was included as an appendix to the amicus curiae brief filed in Baehr v. Miike in 1997.
It was a surprise to some who thought the doctrinal truths about marriage and the family were well understood without restatement. Nevertheless, we felt the confirmation and we went to work. Subjects were identified and discussed by members of the Quorum of the Twelve for nearly a year. Language was proposed, reviewed, and revised. Prayerfully we continually pleaded with the Lord for His inspiration on what we should say and how we should say it. We all learned “line upon line, precept upon precept,” as the Lord has promised (D&C 98:12). During this revelatory process, a proposed text was presented to the First Presidency, who oversee and promulgate Church teachings and doctrine. DHO offers an account of the Proclamation
Boyd K. Packer gives additional context
Boyd K. Packer gave further context to the Proclamation’s Origin:
The First Presidency and Quorum of the Twelve issued a proclamation on the family. I can tell you how that came about. They had a world conference on the family sponsored by the United Nations in Beijing, China. We sent representatives. It was not pleasant what they heard. They called another one in Cairo. Some of our people were there. I read the proceedings of that. The word marriage was not mentioned. It was at a conference on the family, but marriage was not even mentioned. It was then they announced that they were going to have such a conference here in Salt Lake City. Some of us made the recommendation: "They are coming here. We had better proclaim our position.”[1]
The doctrines have long been taught by the Church
The doctrines contained within the Proclamation are doctrines long taught by the Church. We address this elsewhere on the wiki.
Many of the revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants started out as similar documents
Some sections of the Doctrine and Covenants started out as (1) council minutes, (2) official statements of church policy written by lawyers like Oliver Cowdery, (3) letters written by Joseph Smith, (4) excerpts from peoples’ notes recording things that Joseph Smith taught. Examples include D&C 130 and 134. More may be found by reading the headings of the revelations. Those who are bothered by a revelation or doctrinal disquisition being first drafted by others may be comforted knowing that many revelations have been ratified in similar ways.
Notes
- ↑ Boyd K. Packer, "The Instrument of Your Mind and the Foundation of Your Character," CES Fireside (2 February 2003).