![FairMormon Logo](https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2021_fair_logo_primary.png)
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
SpencerMarsh (talk | contribs) (→Cases Where Joint Revelation is Possible Given Joint Stewardship) |
SpencerMarsh (talk | contribs) (→Cases Where Joint Revelation is Possible Given Joint Stewardship) |
||
Line 26: | Line 26: | ||
====Cases Where Joint Revelation is Possible Given Joint Stewardship==== | ====Cases Where Joint Revelation is Possible Given Joint Stewardship==== | ||
− | There are other cases where the stewardship over a particular situation may be joint such as [[Question: What does the Family Proclamation mean when it says fathers | + | There are other cases where the stewardship over a particular situation may be joint such as [[Question: What does the Family Proclamation mean when it says fathers "preside" over their families?|when a husband chooses]] to collapse his authority to guide his family into a joint stewardship with his wife, where they petition God for revelation about a question together, and aren't getting the same answer. |
In these cases, we can do one of two things: | In these cases, we can do one of two things: |
Members of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints believe in the concept of personal revelation by the Holy Ghost. The Holy Ghost is said to be able to lead a person into the truth of all things (Moroni 10:5). Occasionally, it is asked what it might mean when two people receive contradictory answers to the same question. Why would the Holy Ghost reveal inconsistencies to people? Isn’t God supposed to be a God of truth and order? (scripture here). This article will explore this question.
There are several different things that people could potentially refer to when answering this question so this article will direct to at least one other that answers one of the questions here.
Some critics are referring to the fact that people from other religions have had experiences that seem to confirm to them the truth of their gods, sacred texts, and religious beliefs. This question has been explored in depth elsewhere.
Another thing that critics/questioners might be referring to is like times where a person believes that they have received personal revelation that they are supposed to be married to them. The other person receives revelation that they are not supposed to marry the first. In these cases, we should remember the concept of stewardship in revelation. We can only receive true revelation for our own lives. Others are responsible for theirs. As then-Elder Dallin H. Oaks taught:
First, we should understand what can be called the principle of “stewardship in revelation.” Our Heavenly Father’s house is a house of order, where his servants are commanded to “act in the office in which [they are] appointed” (D&C 107:99). [1] This principle applies to revelation. Only the president of the Church receives revelation to guide the entire Church. Only the stake president receives revelation for the special guidance of the stake. The person who receives revelation for the ward is the bishop. For a family, it is the priesthood leadership of the family. Leaders receive revelation for their own stewardships. Individuals can receive revelation to guide their own lives. But when one person purports to receive revelation for another person outside his or her own stewardship—such as a Church member who claims to have revelation to guide the entire Church or a person who claims to have a revelation to guide another person over whom he or she has no presiding authority according to the order of the Church—you can be sure that such revelations are not from the Lord. “There are counterfeit signals.” [2] Satan is a great deceiver, and he is the source of some of these spurious revelations. Others are simply imagined. If a revelation is outside the limits of stewardship, you know it is not from the Lord, and you are not bound by it. I have heard of cases where a young man told a young woman she should marry him because he had received a revelation that she was to be his eternal companion. If this is a true revelation, it will be confirmed directly to the woman if she seeks to know. In the meantime, she is under no obligation to heed it. She should seek her own guidance and make up her own mind. The man can receive revelation to guide his own actions, but he cannot properly receive revelation to direct hers. She is outside his stewardship.[3]
There are other cases where the stewardship over a particular situation may be joint such as when a husband chooses to collapse his authority to guide his family into a joint stewardship with his wife, where they petition God for revelation about a question together, and aren't getting the same answer.
In these cases, we can do one of two things:
It is the author’s hope that this article will be good gathering point for resources for anyone struggling with this type of a question.
Notes
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now