Difference between revisions of "Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Mulek"

m (Response)
m (Endnotes)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
# {{note|welch1}} John W. Welch, ed., ''Reexploring the Book of Mormon'' (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1992), 142–44.
 
# {{note|welch1}} John W. Welch, ed., ''Reexploring the Book of Mormon'' (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1992), 142–44.
 
# {{note|chadwick1}}{{JBMS-12-2-9}}
 
# {{note|chadwick1}}{{JBMS-12-2-9}}
 +
# {{note|nibley1}} http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/display.php?table=transcripts&id=34
  
 
==Further reading==  
 
==Further reading==  

Revision as of 19:39, 25 September 2007

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

Criticism

Critics of the Book of Mormon argue that it contradicts the Bible when it states that one of King Zedekiah's sons (Mulek) escaped and came to the Americas.

Source(s) of the Criticism

  • Utah Lighthouse Ministries.
  • Saints Alive Ministry Newsletter. May-June 1999.
  • Life After Ministries.

Response

The Book of Mormon teaches that when Jerusalem was destroyed by Babylon during the reign of Zedekiah all of the sons of Zedekiah were killed, except one son named Mulek. Omni 1:15, Helaman 8:21

Biblical evidence does not preclude the existence of another son of King Zedekiah. In fact, recent evidence brought to light by non-LDS scholars indicates otherwise:

The first clue of the existence and escape of Mulek, son of Zedekiah, can be found in 2 Kings 25:1-10, which reports that Nebuchadrezzar and "all his host" scattered "all the men" and "all [the king's] army" and burnt "all the houses of Jerusalem," and with "all the army" they destroyed the walls. In the midst of all this, however, 2 Kings 25:7 omits the word all when it reports only that "the sons" of Zedekiah were killed, leaving open the question whether all of his sons were slain.[1]

Although it is debatable[2], there is some evidence that "Malchiah the son of Hammelech" in Jeremiah 38꞉6 is a possible reference to the Book of Mormon's Mulek.[3] Furthermore, there is significant evidence of a "Seal of Mulek" being discovered in Jerusalem. [4]

Hugh Nibley has also written about some ancient documents found in the city Lachish during the time of Lehi. These documents help corroborate the story of Mulek and Lehi. [5]

Conclusion

A summary of the argument against the criticism.

Endnotes

  1. [note]  John W. Welch, ed., Reexploring the Book of Mormon (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1992), 142–44.
  2. [note]  John A. Tvedtnes, John Gee, and Matthew Roper, “Book of Mormon Names Attested in Ancient Hebrew Inscriptions,” Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 9/1 (2000): 79n58
  3. [note]  John W. Welch, ed., Reexploring the Book of Mormon (Salt Lake City: Deseret Book and FARMS, 1992), 142–44.
  4. [note] Jeffrey R. Chadwick, "Has the Seal of Mulek Been Found?," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 12/2 (2003). [72–83] link
  5. [note]  http://maxwellinstitute.byu.edu/display.php?table=transcripts&id=34

Further reading

FAIR wiki articles

Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Mulek


FAIR web site

External links

  • Jeffrey R. Chadwick, "Has the Seal of Mulek Been Found?," Journal of Book of Mormon Studies 12/2 (2003). [72–83] link
  • John L. Sorenson, "The Mulekites," Brigham Young University Studies 30 no. ? (Summer 1990), 6–22. off-site

Printed material