FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and Freemasonry/Joseph Smith's involvement"
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
|S= | |S= | ||
|L1=Question: Were Joseph Smith's final words, "O Lord, my God!" a cry for help or mercy from Freemasons in the mob at the Carthage jail? | |L1=Question: Were Joseph Smith's final words, "O Lord, my God!" a cry for help or mercy from Freemasons in the mob at the Carthage jail? | ||
| − | |L2= | + | |L2=Improvement Era, "Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered" |
| + | |L3= | ||
}} | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | {{:Joseph_Smith/Martyrdom/Masonic_cry_of_distress}} | ||
{{ChurchResponseBar | {{ChurchResponseBar | ||
|author=Charles W. Penrose | |author=Charles W. Penrose | ||
| Line 19: | Line 22: | ||
'''Answer''': Joseph Smith the Prophet was a Mason. <ref>{{IE|author=Charles W. Penrose|article=Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered|date=September 1912|vol=15|num=11}}</ref> | '''Answer''': Joseph Smith the Prophet was a Mason. <ref>{{IE|author=Charles W. Penrose|article=Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered|date=September 1912|vol=15|num=11}}</ref> | ||
}} | }} | ||
| − | |||
{{:Primary_sources/Reed_C._Durham_on_1974_talk}} | {{:Primary_sources/Reed_C._Durham_on_1974_talk}} | ||
{{endnotes sources}} | {{endnotes sources}} | ||
Revision as of 07:31, 4 August 2017
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Joseph Smith's involvement in Freemasonry
Jump to details:
- Question: Were Joseph Smith's final words, "O Lord, my God!" a cry for help or mercy from Freemasons in the mob at the Carthage jail?
- Improvement Era, "Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered"
Improvement Era, "Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered"
Charles W. Penrose, Improvement Era, (September 1912)Question 17: Was Joseph Smith, Jr., a Mason?
Answer: Joseph Smith the Prophet was a Mason. [1]
Reed C. Durham letter issued after his 1974 talk “Is There No Help for the Widow’s Son?”
Reed C. Durham wrote and circulated this letter after an address given at a Mormon History Association meeting on 20 April 1974.
To Whom It May Concern:
On Saturday, April 20, 1974, at the Mormon History Association Annual Meeting at Nauvoo, Illinois, I delivered the Presidential Address entitled, “Is There No Help for the Widow’s Son?” At that time I was gravely concerned that the presentation of my findings and conclusions, as a result of long months of research, would not be properly interpreted; and that regardless of what I attempted to say, misunderstandings would occur. My concerns were justified. I have been informed of instances where even my own colleagues in the Mormon History Association, and also some close friends within the Church misinterpreted what I said, and more important to me, in some cases even questioned my faith in Joseph Smith and the Church.
Of course, I assume the full responsibility for creating those questions, concerns, and misunderstandings. It was because I was not skillful enough, erudite enough, nor perhaps prayerful enough to make my personal position and feelings clearly known.
Therefore, regardless of what I said, or what interpretations were placed upon what I said, let it be known at this time, that:
- 1. I know that Joseph Smith was/is indeed a true prophet of God – the one called under direction of Jesus Christ to usher in this dispensation of the fullness of times.
- 2. I know further that Temple Work, with all its ramifications including Eternal Marriage and the Endowment ceremony is divinely inspired.
- 3. Because of the personal witness I have received by the Spirit (which has been complemented and supported by continual study and experience), the prime criterion or standard of judgment I am committed to employ as an explanation of any aspect of the Church – either of Joseph Smith and/or the Temple ceremonies – is that of divine revelation.
Had I delivered my address in Nauvoo, making sure that my knowledge and conviction of the above three statements was clearly reflected in the subject matter of my address, I am confident that fewer misunderstandings would have been occasioned; and my address would have more clearly approximated my honest feelings. I am deeply sorry that such was not the case.
Sincerely,
Reed C. Durham, Jr.
Notes
- ↑ Charles W. Penrose, "Peculiar Questions Briefly Answered," Improvement Era 15 no. 11 (September 1912).