Difference between revisions of "The Book of Mormon as history"

Revision as of 06:41, 10 June 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 06:42, 10 June 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 5:		Line 5:
	|H2=Evidence of the historicity of the Book of Mormon		|H2=Evidence of the historicity of the Book of Mormon
	|S=		|S=
−	|L1=The Nephite calendar	+	|L1=Question: Was the "week" unknown in ancient America?
	|L2=Warfare in the Book of Mormon		|L2=Warfare in the Book of Mormon
	|L3=The description of olive horticulture in the Book of Mormon		|L3=The description of olive horticulture in the Book of Mormon
	}}		}}
	</onlyinclude>		</onlyinclude>
−	{{:Book of Mormon/Calendar}}	+	{{:Question: Was the "week" unknown in ancient America?}}
	{{:Book of Mormon/Evidences/Olive horticulture}}		{{:Book of Mormon/Evidences/Olive horticulture}}

---

Revision as of 06:42, 10 June 2017

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Evidence of the historicity of the Book of Mormon

Jump to details:

• Question: Was the "week" unknown in ancient America?
• Warfare in the Book of Mormon
• The description of olive horticulture in the Book of Mormon

The Nephite calendar

Jump to details:

• Question: Was the "week" unknown in ancient America?

The description of olive horticulture in the Book of Mormon

Summary: Does the Book of Mormon's account of olive culture in Jacob 5 match what we know about this subject? The Book of Mormon provides a remarkably accurate portrait of olive horticulture. There are two points at which the allegory/parable deviates from the known principles of growing olives; in both cases, the allegory's characters draw the reader's attention to these deviations with some amazement. Thus, these 'mistakes' play a dramatic role in demonstrating the allegory/parable's meaning.

Jump to details:

• Question: Is the Book of Mormon's account of olive horticulture in Jacob 5 accurate?

Hebraisms in the Book of Mormon

Summary: The Book of Mormon does indeed have authentic Semitic constructions in it, but LDS need to tread cautiously in establishing them. Each must be evaluated on its own merits. Hebraisms that could have been known to Joseph Smith may still be authentic, and may still enhance our appreciation of the text, but they are weak evidence for Book of Mormon antiquity.

If-and conditionals

Summary: The first edition of the Book of Mormon contained several examples of a grammatical structure not known in English, but common in Hebrew: the so-called if/and conditional.

Names: authentic Old World names in the Book of Mormon

Chiasmus

Summary: A literary structure known as "chiasmus" exists in the Book of Mormon. It is claimed that the presence of chiasmus in the Book of Mormon is either coincidental, an artifact of the observer, or not impressive since examples of chiastic patterns have been found in the Doctrine and Covenants or other 19th century writing.

Names: authentic Old World names in the Book of Mormon

Ancient motifs in the Book of Mormon

Summary: Some aspects of the Book of Mormon record make little sense if it is read as a 19th century creation. If its underlying source is an ancient text, however, then these elements enrich our understanding of the volume and its message.