|
|
Line 11: |
Line 11: |
| </onlyinclude> | | </onlyinclude> |
| {{:Book of Mormon/Calendar}} | | {{:Book of Mormon/Calendar}} |
− | {{:Book of Mormon/Warfare}}
| |
| {{:Book of Mormon/Evidences/Olive horticulture}} | | {{:Book of Mormon/Evidences/Olive horticulture}} |
| | | |
− | ===== =====
| + | |
− | {{SummaryItem
| |
− | |link=Book of Mormon/Geography/Old World
| |
− | |subject=Book of Mormon geography in the Old World
| |
− | |summary=A discussion of the Arabian, or Old World, geography of the Book of Mormon enjoys many advantages over discussion of New World matters. Chief among these is the fact that we know we certainty where the story begins—in Old World Jerusalem. The details of Lehi's desert travels had been extracted from the text by the 1970s. It is important to note how early these models were developed; current-day critics sometimes charge that LDS scholars have "retrofitted" their models to accommodate chance discoveries like "Nahom," but this is false.
| |
− | }}
| |
| ===== ===== | | ===== ===== |
| {{SummaryItem | | {{SummaryItem |
Revision as of 07:41, 10 June 2017
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Jump to details:
Jump to details:
Summary: Does the Book of Mormon's account of olive culture in Jacob 5 match what we know about this subject? The Book of Mormon provides a remarkably accurate portrait of olive horticulture. There are two points at which the allegory/parable deviates from the known principles of growing olives; in both cases, the allegory's characters draw the reader's attention to these deviations with some amazement. Thus, these 'mistakes' play a dramatic role in demonstrating the allegory/parable's meaning.
Jump to details:
Summary: The Book of Mormon does indeed have authentic Semitic constructions in it, but LDS need to tread cautiously in establishing them. Each must be evaluated on its own merits. Hebraisms that could have been known to Joseph Smith may still be authentic, and may still enhance our appreciation of the text, but they are weak evidence for Book of Mormon antiquity.
Summary: The first edition of the Book of Mormon contained several examples of a grammatical structure not known in English, but common in Hebrew: the so-called if/and conditional.
Summary: A literary structure known as "chiasmus" exists in the Book of Mormon. It is claimed that the presence of chiasmus in the Book of Mormon is either coincidental, an artifact of the observer, or not impressive since examples of chiastic patterns have been found in the Doctrine and Covenants or other 19th century writing.
Summary: Some aspects of the Book of Mormon record make little sense if it is read as a 19th century creation. If its underlying source is an ancient text, however, then these elements enrich our understanding of the volume and its message.