Difference between revisions of "Website reviews/Mormon Stories"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-}}\n{{FAIRAnalysisHeader\n\|title=(.*)\n\|author=(.*)\n(.*)\n(.*)\n\|previous=(.*)\n\|next=(.*)\n(.*)\n}} +|T=\1\n|A=\2\n|<=\5\n|>=\6\n}}))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{H2\n\|L(.*)\n\|H2(.*)\n(.*)\n(.*)\n\|T +{{H1\n|L\1\n|H1\2\n\3\n\4\n|T))
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{FairMormon}}   
 
{{FairMormon}}   
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
{{H2
+
{{H1
 
|L={{check}}
 
|L={{check}}
|H2=Responses to <em>Mormon Stories</em> and <em>Open Stories Foundation</em>
+
|H1=Responses to <em>Mormon Stories</em> and <em>Open Stories Foundation</em>
 
|S=
 
|S=
 
|L1=
 
|L1=

Revision as of 21:09, 9 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Responses to Mormon Stories and Open Stories Foundation



A FAIR Analysis of: Mormon Stories and Open Stories Foundation, a work by author: John Dehlin, et al.

Reviews of this website or organization

Articles which respond to specific questions or criticism

Ad hominem case study: An attempt to portray Dan Peterson as dishonest and possibly mentally ill

Summary: John Dehlin attempts to portray Dan Peterson as dishonest and possibly mentally ill

Ad hominem case study: An attempt to dismiss Rosalynde Welch because of who she is related to

Summary: John Dehlin attempts to dismiss Rosalynde Welch because her father-in-law is Jack Welch, founder of FARMS.
  • Click here to see FairMormon Answers to specific issues raised by this work or source's podcast.