Difference between revisions of "Mormon responses to atheism"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{SummaryHeader\n\|link=(.*)\n\|heading=(.*)\n\|summary=(.*)\n\|sublink +{{H1\n|L=\1\n|H1=\2\n|S=\3\n|L))
m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-\|sublink +|L))
Line 12: Line 12:
 
|subject=Subjective revelation
 
|subject=Subjective revelation
 
|summary=Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."
 
|summary=Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."
|sublink1=Question: Is a "burning in the bosom" simply a subjective, emotion-based, unreliable way to practice self-deception?
+
|L1=Question: Is a "burning in the bosom" simply a subjective, emotion-based, unreliable way to practice self-deception?
|sublink2=Question: Why do critics of Mormonism who belong to other religions discount spiritual experiences?
+
|L2=Question: Why do critics of Mormonism who belong to other religions discount spiritual experiences?
 
}}
 
}}
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 00:52, 8 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Mormon responses to atheism



Subjective revelation

Summary: Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."

Jump to Subtopic:

Atheism