Difference between revisions of "Prophetic words as scripture"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{SummaryHeader\n\|link=(.*)\n\|subject=(.*)\n\|summary=(.*)\n\|sublink +{{H2\n|L=\1\n|H2=\2\n|S=\3\n|L))
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Articles FAIR copyright}}
 
{{Articles FAIR copyright}}
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
{{SummaryHeader
+
{{H2
|link=Mormonism and doctrine/Statements by past prophets
+
|L=Mormonism and doctrine/Statements by past prophets
|subject=Statements made by past prophets as "scripture"
+
|H2=Statements made by past prophets as "scripture"
|summary=Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.
+
|S=Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.
|sublink1=Question: Did Brigham Young state that everything he said could be considered "scripture"?
+
|L1=Question: Did Brigham Young state that everything he said could be considered "scripture"?
 
|sublink2=Question: When are the writings or sermons of Church leaders entitled to the claim of scripture?
 
|sublink2=Question: When are the writings or sermons of Church leaders entitled to the claim of scripture?
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 23:48, 7 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Statements made by past prophets as "scripture"

Summary: Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.


Jump to details:


Notes