Difference between revisions of "Website reviews/Mormon Stories"

m (Bot: Automated text replacement (-{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 1...)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
{{:Mormonism and apologetics/"ad hominem"/Case study/John Dehlin}}
 
{{:Mormonism and apologetics/"ad hominem"/Case study/John Dehlin}}
 
* [http://en.fairmormon.org/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:CriticalWork:MormonStories:Podcast Click here] to see FairMormon Answers to specific issues raised by this work or source's podcast.
 
* [http://en.fairmormon.org/Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:CriticalWork:MormonStories:Podcast Click here] to see FairMormon Answers to specific issues raised by this work or source's podcast.
 
 
 
[[fr:Specific works/An Insider's View of Mormon Origins]]
 

Revision as of 16:59, 5 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Responses to Mormon Stories and Open Stories Foundation


A FAIR Analysis of:
Mormon Stories and Open Stories Foundation
A work by author: John Dehlin, et al.

Reviews of this website or organization

Articles which respond to specific questions or criticism

Ad hominem case study: An attempt to portray Dan Peterson as dishonest and possibly mentally ill

Summary: John Dehlin attempts to portray Dan Peterson as dishonest and possibly mentally ill

Ad hominem case study: An attempt to dismiss Rosalynde Welch because of who she is related to

Summary: John Dehlin attempts to dismiss Rosalynde Welch because her father-in-law is Jack Welch, founder of FARMS.
  • Click here to see FairMormon Answers to specific issues raised by this work or source's podcast.