Difference between revisions of "Peterson (2005): The plates "are an indigestible lump in the throats of people...who contend that there were no Nephites but that Joseph Smith was nonetheless an inspired prophet""

(Peterson (2005): "[The plates] are an indigestible lump in the throats of people...who contend that there were no Nephites but that Joseph Smith was nonetheless an inspired prophet")
Line 15: Line 15:
 
[[Category:No Man Knows My History]]
 
[[Category:No Man Knows My History]]
  
 
[[en:Source:Peterson:FR 17:2:They are an indigestible lump in the throats of people like him who contend that there were no Nephites]]
 
 
[[es:Fuente:Peterson:FR 17:2:Son una masa indigesta en las gargantas de la gente como él que sostienen que no hubo nefitas]]
 
[[es:Fuente:Peterson:FR 17:2:Son una masa indigesta en las gargantas de la gente como él que sostienen que no hubo nefitas]]
 
[[pt:Fonte:Peterson:FR 17:2:Eles são um pedaço indigesto nas gargantas de pessoas como ele que afirmam que não houve nefitas]]
 
[[pt:Fonte:Peterson:FR 17:2:Eles são um pedaço indigesto nas gargantas de pessoas como ele que afirmam que não houve nefitas]]

Revision as of 15:52, 5 June 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Peterson (2005): "[The plates] are an indigestible lump in the throats of people...who contend that there were no Nephites but that Joseph Smith was nonetheless an inspired prophet"

Daniel C. Peterson said:

A knowledgeable academic friend who does not believe in the historical authenticity of the Book of Mormon once asked me, since it seems that the plates were not actually necessary to the translation process and were sometimes not even present in the room, what purpose they served. I responded that I did not know, exactly, except for one thing: They are an indigestible lump in the throats of people like him who contend that there were no Nephites but that Joseph Smith was nonetheless an inspired prophet. If the plates really existed, somebody made them. And if no Nephites existed to make them, then either Joseph Smith, or God, or somebody else seems to have been engaged in simple fraud. The testimony of the witnesses exists, I think, to force a dichotomous choice: true or false? [1]


Notes

  1. Daniel C. Peterson, "Editor's Introduction—Not So Easily Dismissed: Some Facts for Which Counterexplanations of the Book of Mormon Will Need to Account," FARMS Review 17/2 (2005): xi–lxix. off-site