Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and doctrine/Doctrine of the past"

()
()
Line 9: Line 9:
 
|sublink1=The fallibility of prophets
 
|sublink1=The fallibility of prophets
 
}}
 
}}
===== =====
+
{{:Mormonism and doctrine/Statements by past prophets}}
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=Mormonism and doctrine/Statements by past prophets
 
|subject=Statements by past prophets
 
|summary=Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.
 
|sublink1=Question: Did Brigham Young state that everything he said could be considered "scripture"?
 
|sublink2=Question: When are the writings or sermons of Church leaders entitled to the claim of scripture?
 
}}
 
 
{{:Mormonism and doctrine/Prophets are not infallible}}
 
{{:Mormonism and doctrine/Prophets are not infallible}}
 
 
{{:Mormonism and polygamy/The Law of Adoption}}
 
{{:Mormonism and polygamy/The Law of Adoption}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>

Revision as of 09:39, 27 May 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Mormon doctrine of the past


Mormon doctrine of the past

Jump to Subtopic:

  1. REDIRECT Prophetic words as scripture

The fallibility of prophets

Summary: Are prophets considered infallible? Critics sometimes impose absolutist assumptions on the Church and hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets. Critics therefore insist that any statement by any LDS Church leader represents LDS doctrine and is thus something that is secretly believed, or that should be believed, by Latter-day Saints.


Jump to details:


The Law of Adoption: The sealing of men and women as children to prominent Latter-day Saint leaders

Summary: Critics point to the early practice of sealing men and women as children to prominent LDS leaders as an example of changes in LDS belief.


Jump to details: