Revision as of 16:26, 10 May 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) ← Older edit		Revision as of 22:13, 25 May 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 21:		Line 21:
	}}		}}
	</onlyinclude>		</onlyinclude>
−
−	{{Articles Footer 1}}
−
	<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->		<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
	[[en:Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism]]		[[en:Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism]]
	[[es:Doctrina y Convenios/Crítica]]		[[es:Doctrina y Convenios/Crítica]]
	[[pt:Doutrina e Convênios/Crítica]]		[[pt:Doutrina e Convênios/Crítica]]

---

Revision as of 22:13, 25 May 2017

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants

Contradiction between Section 132 and Jacob 2

Summary: Critics note that D&C 132 speaks favorably about some Old Testament practitioners of plural marriage, while Jacob 2 is negative. Some claim that this discrepancy is a contradiction, suggesting that Joseph Smith's ideas about plural marriage changed, and the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants are not inspired.

D&C 84 states that God cannot be seen without priesthood

Summary: How could Joseph Smith has seen God the Father and Jesus Christ during the First Vision if he had not yet received the priesthood?