Difference between revisions of "Repudiated ideas about race"

()
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
+
{{Articles FAIR copyright}}
{{Resource Title|Repudiated early Mormon teachings regarding race}}
 
{{summary}}
 
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
 
{{SummaryHeader
 
{{SummaryHeader
 
|link=Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/Repudiated ideas
 
|link=Mormonism and racial issues/Blacks and the priesthood/Repudiated ideas
|subject=Ideas related to race that have been repudiated by the Church
+
|subject=Repudiated early Mormon teachings regarding race
 
|summary=There exist previously taught ideas which have been repudiated by Church leaders since the ban. Among these are the notion that Blacks were somehow not as "valiant" in the pre-existence, and that interracial marriage is forbidden.
 
|summary=There exist previously taught ideas which have been repudiated by Church leaders since the ban. Among these are the notion that Blacks were somehow not as "valiant" in the pre-existence, and that interracial marriage is forbidden.
 
}}
 
}}

Revision as of 17:14, 24 May 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Repudiated early Mormon teachings regarding race

Summary: There exist previously taught ideas which have been repudiated by Church leaders since the ban. Among these are the notion that Blacks were somehow not as "valiant" in the pre-existence, and that interracial marriage is forbidden.

Mormonism and the concept that some were "neutral" in the "war in heaven"

Summary: It is true that LDS scripture states that those with lighter skin color "are favored because of what they did as spirits in a pre-earth life?" Is it true that some Church leaders taught that people who were born with dark skin were "neutral" in the pre-existence?

Mormonism and the "curse of Cain"

LDS scriptures that were cited in support of the ban



Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims