FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Video/Search for the Truth DVD/Intro"
EdwinSlack (talk | contribs) (Expanded the section on false premises in the film.) |
|||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
First, Patrick sets up a false dichotomy—he proposes to compare Joseph Smith and Jesus Christ. As any practicing Mormon knows, there is no comparison between the two. One is a prophet of God and the other is the Son of God. To compare the two of them is to compare apples and oranges, and to imply that Mormons equate Joseph Smith and Jesus Christ is to imply a falsehood. Mormons don't make the comparison; only our critics attempt to assert that we do. | First, Patrick sets up a false dichotomy—he proposes to compare Joseph Smith and Jesus Christ. As any practicing Mormon knows, there is no comparison between the two. One is a prophet of God and the other is the Son of God. To compare the two of them is to compare apples and oranges, and to imply that Mormons equate Joseph Smith and Jesus Christ is to imply a falsehood. Mormons don't make the comparison; only our critics attempt to assert that we do. | ||
− | Second, the statement creates a false sense of competition between Jesus Christ and Joseph Smith and presupposes that there are disparities in their teachings such that if one is right, the other is wrong. Certainly this is part and parcel of the type of message the film is trying to create, but it is not accurate. Joseph Smith was a witness for the divinity of Jesus Christ, bearing strong testimony for the efficacy of Christ's atoning sacrifice, and the reality of Christ's resurrection. | + | Second, the statement creates a false sense of competition between Jesus Christ and Joseph Smith and presupposes that there are disparities in their teachings such that if one is right, the other is wrong. Certainly this is part and parcel of the type of message the film is trying to create, but it is not accurate. Joseph Smith was a witness for the divinity of Jesus Christ, bearing strong testimony for the efficacy of Christ's atoning sacrifice, and the reality of Christ's resurrection. Such a witness would be expected, of course, from a prophet of God. |
Another faulty premise is to state that "men" are being compared. It seems disingenuous for Patrick to state that Jesus was a man while a later commentator in the video states that He was not a man. According to Dr. Phil Roberts, president of the Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, "[Jesus] was God in the flesh. He was eternal with God, co-equal, uncreated." This is obviously not a man, as Patrick asserts. | Another faulty premise is to state that "men" are being compared. It seems disingenuous for Patrick to state that Jesus was a man while a later commentator in the video states that He was not a man. According to Dr. Phil Roberts, president of the Midwestern Baptist Theological Seminary, "[Jesus] was God in the flesh. He was eternal with God, co-equal, uncreated." This is obviously not a man, as Patrick asserts. |
Revision as of 07:28, 20 March 2007
|
|
|
|