Revision as of 08:00, 11 April 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (→‎) ← Older edit		Revision as of 16:26, 10 May 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}	+	{{Articles FAIR copyright}}
−	{{Resource Title|Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants}}
−	{{summary}}
	<onlyinclude>		<onlyinclude>
	{{SummaryHeader		{{SummaryHeader
	|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism		|link=Doctrine and Covenants/Criticism
−	|subject=Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants	+	|heading=Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants
	|summary=		|summary=
	}}		}}

---

Revision as of 16:26, 10 May 2017

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants

Contradiction between Section 132 and Jacob 2

Summary: Critics note that D&C 132 speaks favorably about some Old Testament practitioners of plural marriage, while Jacob 2 is negative. Some claim that this discrepancy is a contradiction, suggesting that Joseph Smith's ideas about plural marriage changed, and the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants are not inspired.

D&C 84 states that God cannot be seen without priesthood

Summary: How could Joseph Smith has seen God the Father and Jesus Christ during the First Vision if he had not yet received the priesthood?