Revision as of 08:23, 12 April 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (→‎) ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:24, 12 April 2017 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (→‎) Newer edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:
	|sublink6=Question: What are the details of Joseph Smith's 1826 "trial" for "glasslooking"		|sublink6=Question: What are the details of Joseph Smith's 1826 "trial" for "glasslooking"
	|sublink7=Question: What happened to Josiah Stowell? Did he conclude he had been defrauded after the court hearing?		|sublink7=Question: What happened to Josiah Stowell? Did he conclude he had been defrauded after the court hearing?
		+	|sublink8=Question: Was Joseph Smith found guilty of being a "con man" in 1826?
	}}		}}

---

Revision as of 08:24, 12 April 2017

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Joseph Smith legal issues: Trials

Joseph Smith and legal trials

1826 trial for "glasslooking"

Summary: Joseph Smith was brought to trial in 1826 for "glasslooking." Didn't Hugh Nibley claim that if this trial record existed that it would be "the most damning evidence in existence against Joseph Smith?"

Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?

Summary: Was Joseph convicted of being a "con man" in a court of law in 1826?