Difference between revisions of "The Bible/Science"

()
Line 13: Line 13:
 
|subject=Archaeology and the Bible
 
|subject=Archaeology and the Bible
 
|summary=Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.
 
|summary=Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.
|sublink1=Question: What criticisms are raised with regard to Book of Mormon archaeology compared to that of the Bible?}
+
|sublink1=Question: What criticisms are raised with regard to Book of Mormon archaeology compared to that of the Bible?
 
|sublink2=Question: What archaeological evidence might be considered the minimal irrefutable proof needed to convince a non-believing world of the authenticity of the Nephite scripture?
 
|sublink2=Question: What archaeological evidence might be considered the minimal irrefutable proof needed to convince a non-believing world of the authenticity of the Nephite scripture?
 
|sublink3=Question: How would an archaeologist distinguish a Christian's pot from that of a non-Christian?
 
|sublink3=Question: How would an archaeologist distinguish a Christian's pot from that of a non-Christian?
Line 23: Line 23:
 
|sublink9=Question: Did Dee F. Green say that there is no such thing as Book of Mormon archaeology?
 
|sublink9=Question: Did Dee F. Green say that there is no such thing as Book of Mormon archaeology?
 
}}
 
}}
 +
 
===== =====
 
===== =====
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 18:29, 11 April 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Science and the Bible


Science and the Bible


Archaeology and the Bible

Summary: Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.

Flood, global or local

Summary: Modern scientific knowledge regarding the diversity of species, language and evidence of continuous human habitation does not support the Biblical story that a global flood wiped out most life as recently as 4,400 years ago
  1. REDIRECTThe Creation