Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/By His Own Hand upon Papyrus: A New Look at the Joseph Smith Papyri/Chapter 3"

m (RogerNicholson moved page Criticism of Mormonism/Books/By His Own Hand upon Papyrus: A New Look at the Joseph Smith Papyri/Index/Chapter 3 to [[Criticism of Mormonism/Books/By His Own Hand upon Papyrus: A New Look at the Joseph Smith Papyri/Chapter...)
(25)
Line 18: Line 18:
 
}}
 
}}
  
====25====
+
==Response to claim: 25 - Some elements of the facsimilies "appeared....to be guesswork, probably incorrect restorations of missing sections of the original papyri"==
{{IndexClaim
+
{{IndexClaimItemShort
 +
|title=By His Own Hand upon Papyrus
 
|claim=Some elements of the facsimilies "appeared....to be guesswork, probably incorrect restorations of missing sections of the original papyri."
 
|claim=Some elements of the facsimilies "appeared....to be guesswork, probably incorrect restorations of missing sections of the original papyri."
 
|authorsources=
 
|authorsources=
 
|response=
 
|response=
 +
}}
 +
{{information|This is correct. Whoever filled in the missing pieces of the facsimilies to prepare them for publication simply copied elements that were present elsewhere in the papyri. Note, however, that Joseph Smith never provided explanations for any of the filled in portions.
 
}}
 
}}
  

Revision as of 22:34, 6 February 2017

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Response to claims made in "Chapter 3: Charges and Rebuttals"


A work by author: Charles M. Larson

25

Claim
The author claims that the three facsimilies in the Book of Abraham are "copies of rather common Egyptian funerary documents."


Response
 FAIR WIKI EDITORS: Check sources


Response to claim: 25 - Some elements of the facsimilies "appeared....to be guesswork, probably incorrect restorations of missing sections of the original papyri"

The author(s) of By His Own Hand upon Papyrus make(s) the following claim:

Some elements of the facsimilies "appeared....to be guesswork, probably incorrect restorations of missing sections of the original papyri."

FAIR's Response

Fact checking results: This claim is based upon correct information - The author is providing knowledge concerning some particular fact, subject, or event

This is correct. Whoever filled in the missing pieces of the facsimilies to prepare them for publication simply copied elements that were present elsewhere in the papyri. Note, however, that Joseph Smith never provided explanations for any of the filled in portions.


29

Claim
Egyptologists claim that the priest in Facsimile 1 should have the head of Anubis rather than a "strangely un-Egyptian" human head.


Response


Claim


Response
 FAIR WIKI EDITORS: Check sources


Claim


Response
 FAIR WIKI EDITORS: Check sources