Difference between revisions of "Latter-day Saint Temples/Endowment/Oath of vengeance"

m (External links)
(Complete rewrite, draft #1 (article material does not correlate to topic; moved previous text to Penalties in the endowment))
Line 3: Line 3:
  
 
==Criticism==
 
==Criticism==
Critics point out that a former version of the endowment used to contain mention of various "penalties" associated with the breaking of the temple covenants. They use this fact to claim that the temple encouraged violence or vengeance against those who violated its covenants, or that the Church sought to use fear to motivate members to keep their covenants.
+
Critics claim that a former version of the endowment contained an oath taken by participants that they would exact vengeance upon the United States or its government.
  
 
===Source(s) of the criticism===
 
===Source(s) of the criticism===
Line 9: Line 9:
  
 
==Response==
 
==Response==
Critics misrepresent this part of the temple ceremony, which is relatively easy to do since members endowed since April 1990 will have had no direct experience with the penalties mentioned. Likewise, with the passage of time many members have only a vague recollection of of the endowment ceremony before the changes were made.
+
The leaders of the Church have modified the endowment from time to time. Prior to changes made in 1927, there was an "oath of vengeance" that was taken by participants in the endowment.
  
Contrary to the critics' representation, the ceremony said nothing about what would happen to people if they revealed that which they had covenanted to keep secret. Nor did the ceremony encourage anyone to inflict penalties on another.
+
The oath was an outgrowth of Joseph Smith's inner circle which continued to meet as after his death.{{ref|quinn1}} Joseph Smith's circle met to test revelation ("try all things"), pray for the healing of sick members, pray for the success of church projects, and pray for deliverance from their enemies. After Joseph's death, Heber C. Kimball recalled how the prayer circle met and prayed for God's vengeance.{{ref|kimball1}}
  
Rather, the person making the covenant indicated what they would prefer to have done to themselves ''rather than reveal sacred things''. (Such penalties also had symbolic implications, which are beyond the scope of this article). So, the temple ceremony did not involve descriptions of what God (or others) would do to someone if they failed to keep their covenants, but instead illustrated the lengths to which ''someone else'' might go to try to get a member to break their covenants. 
+
Summarizing Willard Richards' activities immediately after the martyrdom, historian Claire Noall wrote:
  
The penalties served, among other things, to teach us how determined we should be to resist those who would encourage us to violate covenants. The endowment said nothing about the ''consequences'' of violating covenants save that one would be judged by God for doing so. Such judgment of necessity remains always in the hands of God alone. (The Church might, of course, discipline a member for violation of covenants via excommunication, but this is the extent of the penalty which the Church can apply.{{ref|ex1}})
+
:True, in this [1850] speech Richards finally denounced the actual murderers; but when notifying the Church of Joseph Smith's death at Carthage jail, he wrote to Nauvoo that the people of Carthage expected the Mormons to rise, but he had "promised them no." The next day from the steps of the Prophet's home, he reminded his people that he had pledged his word and his honor for their peaceful conduct. And when writing the news of Smith's death to Brigham Young then near Boston, Willard Richards said the blood of martyrs does not cry from the ground for vengeance; vengeance is the Lord's.{{ref|noall1}}
  
This important distinction was sometimes not well understood by some members, and this is likely one reason that penalties were removed from the current ceremony. The penalties confused people more than it helped them, in our era, and the presentation of the endowment [[Temple_endowment_changes|has changed]] (and will likely continue to change) when necessary to administer the ordinances and associated doctrinal teaching in the most effective way.
+
It is easy for modern Latter-day Saints who don't experience mobocracy, threats on our life, and kidnapping attempts to wish that leaders would have prayed ''for'' their enemies instead of for harm or justice to befall them. We live in kinder, gentler times. But nineteenth-century Mormons — especially those who came out of Nauvoo — saw the hand of God whenever their persecutors suffered misfortune, a feeling common to most powerless, persecuted minority groups.
 +
 
 +
Temple work in general and, more specifically, prayers that God, rather than Mormon members, would avenge Joseph Smith is what was the salvation of the church in Nauvoo. Instead of giving vent to passionate desires for revenge using the impressively-sized Nauvoo Legion, the brethren were able to get members to channel their frustration and anger into petitions to the Almighty for justice. Their actual energy was concentrated on the things of heaven through temple building and service. Temple prayer became a way of ritually memorializing Joseph Smith's martyrdom.
 +
 
 +
This is the background of ''the oath to pray for God's vengeance'' (a much more adequate phrase than ''oath of vengeance''). Most accounts of the temple oath stressed that God, rather than man, would do the actual punishing. For example an apostate Mormon testified at the Reed Smoot hearings:
 +
 
 +
:You and each of you do covenant and promise that you will pray and never cease to pray to Almighty God to avenge the blood of the prophets upon this nation, and that you will teach the same to your children and to your children’s children unto the third and fourth generation.
 +
    cited from Bagley BotP p. 21
 +
    note that Bagley’s footnote 66 (in part) seeks to corroborate this late source with a dubious, sensationalistic, quote from William Smith about the Nauvoo temple. However William had been excommunicated before temple work began in late 1845 and William gets the number of endowed members off by over a factor of 3.
 +
 
 +
I am a little uncomfortable for taking the apostate (at the Smoot hearings) version of things and the wording was probably not fixed over time. Here is David H. Cannon’s late reminiscence about Endowment House practices:
 +
 
 +
    pray the Father to avenge the blood of the prophets and righteous men that has been shed, etc. In the endowment house this was given but as persons went there only once, it was not so strongly impressed upon their minds, but in the setting in order [of] the endowments for the dead it was given as it is written in 9 Chapter of Revelations and in that language we importune our Father, not that we may, but that He, our Father, will avenge the blood of martyrs shed for the testimony of Jesus.
 +
 
 +
    – cited in Buerger, Dialogue 34:1 p. 103
 +
 
 +
Although the religous stress was on letting God perform the actual vengeance, individuals sometimes imagined they might be called upon to take a more active role. This surfaced in the apocolyptic language of some patriarchal blessings. Others would make comments about not resting until God carried out vengeance. From the pulpit , the brethren held the entire nation responsible for letting mobocracy get out of control (Paul H. Peterson is a good reference for this.) These us-and-them sentiments existed apart from Joseph’s death, as the Saints had been repeatedly driven and persecuted. However, in my estimation, the oaths of members should have taught them to channel their righteous indignation into petitioning God and for them to work at constructively building up their Zion.  
  
 
==Conclusion==
 
==Conclusion==
Temple penalties involved promising to resist even extreme efforts to cause us to break temple covenants. They never contemplated or advocated inflicting such penalties on others, or the threat of having them inflicted upon us. Only the wicked would inflict such penalties; the endowed member simply covenanted to resist all such efforts.
+
 
  
 
==Endnotes==
 
==Endnotes==
 
+
#{{note|quinn1}}For a history of prayer circles, see {{BYUS | author=D. Michael Quinn | article=Latter-day Saint Prayer Circles|vol=19|num=1|date=Fall 1978|start=79|end=105}}{{pdflink|url=http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/u?/byustudies,712}}
#{{note|ex1}} {{s||DC|134|10}}
+
#{{note|kimball1}}See his 21 December 1845 diary entry in ''The Nauvoo Endowment Companies, 1845–1846: A Documentary History,''  Richard Van Wagoner, Devery Scott Anderson, and Gary James Bergera, eds. (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2005).
 +
#{{note|noall1}}Claire Noall, "The Plains of Warsaw," ''Utah Historical Quarterly'' 25:1 (January 1957), pp. 47–51.
  
 
==Further reading==
 
==Further reading==
Line 35: Line 52:
  
 
===External links===
 
===External links===
*{{BYUS|author=Steven G. Barnett|article=The Canes of the Martyrdom|vol=21|num=2|date=Spring 1981|start=205|end=211}}{{link|url=http://byustudies.byu.edu/Products/MoreInfoPage/MoreInfo.aspx?Type=7&ProdID=1642}}
+
*http://timesandseasons.org/?p=3492
 
{{TempleLinks}}
 
{{TempleLinks}}
  
 
===Printed material===
 
===Printed material===
 
{{TemplePrint}}
 
{{TemplePrint}}

Revision as of 23:04, 1 February 2007

Answers portal
Temples
NauvooTemple modern mini.JPG
Resources.icon.tiny.1.png    RESOURCES

General:


Endowment:


Masonry:

Perspectives.icon.tiny.1.png    PERSPECTIVES
Media.icon.tiny.1.png    MEDIA
Resources.icon.tiny.1.png    OTHER PORTALS

Important note: Members of FAIR take their temple covenants seriously. We consider the temple teachings to be sacred, and will not discuss their specifics in a public forum.

Criticism

Critics claim that a former version of the endowment contained an oath taken by participants that they would exact vengeance upon the United States or its government.

Source(s) of the criticism

 [needs work]

Response

The leaders of the Church have modified the endowment from time to time. Prior to changes made in 1927, there was an "oath of vengeance" that was taken by participants in the endowment.

The oath was an outgrowth of Joseph Smith's inner circle which continued to meet as after his death.[1] Joseph Smith's circle met to test revelation ("try all things"), pray for the healing of sick members, pray for the success of church projects, and pray for deliverance from their enemies. After Joseph's death, Heber C. Kimball recalled how the prayer circle met and prayed for God's vengeance.[2]

Summarizing Willard Richards' activities immediately after the martyrdom, historian Claire Noall wrote:

True, in this [1850] speech Richards finally denounced the actual murderers; but when notifying the Church of Joseph Smith's death at Carthage jail, he wrote to Nauvoo that the people of Carthage expected the Mormons to rise, but he had "promised them no." The next day from the steps of the Prophet's home, he reminded his people that he had pledged his word and his honor for their peaceful conduct. And when writing the news of Smith's death to Brigham Young then near Boston, Willard Richards said the blood of martyrs does not cry from the ground for vengeance; vengeance is the Lord's.[3]

It is easy for modern Latter-day Saints who don't experience mobocracy, threats on our life, and kidnapping attempts to wish that leaders would have prayed for their enemies instead of for harm or justice to befall them. We live in kinder, gentler times. But nineteenth-century Mormons — especially those who came out of Nauvoo — saw the hand of God whenever their persecutors suffered misfortune, a feeling common to most powerless, persecuted minority groups.

Temple work in general and, more specifically, prayers that God, rather than Mormon members, would avenge Joseph Smith is what was the salvation of the church in Nauvoo. Instead of giving vent to passionate desires for revenge using the impressively-sized Nauvoo Legion, the brethren were able to get members to channel their frustration and anger into petitions to the Almighty for justice. Their actual energy was concentrated on the things of heaven through temple building and service. Temple prayer became a way of ritually memorializing Joseph Smith's martyrdom.

This is the background of the oath to pray for God's vengeance (a much more adequate phrase than oath of vengeance). Most accounts of the temple oath stressed that God, rather than man, would do the actual punishing. For example an apostate Mormon testified at the Reed Smoot hearings:

You and each of you do covenant and promise that you will pray and never cease to pray to Almighty God to avenge the blood of the prophets upon this nation, and that you will teach the same to your children and to your children’s children unto the third and fourth generation.
   cited from Bagley BotP p. 21
   note that Bagley’s footnote 66 (in part) seeks to corroborate this late source with a dubious, sensationalistic, quote from William Smith about the Nauvoo temple. However William had been excommunicated before temple work began in late 1845 and William gets the number of endowed members off by over a factor of 3. 

I am a little uncomfortable for taking the apostate (at the Smoot hearings) version of things and the wording was probably not fixed over time. Here is David H. Cannon’s late reminiscence about Endowment House practices:

   pray the Father to avenge the blood of the prophets and righteous men that has been shed, etc. In the endowment house this was given but as persons went there only once, it was not so strongly impressed upon their minds, but in the setting in order [of] the endowments for the dead it was given as it is written in 9 Chapter of Revelations and in that language we importune our Father, not that we may, but that He, our Father, will avenge the blood of martyrs shed for the testimony of Jesus.
   – cited in Buerger, Dialogue 34:1 p. 103

Although the religous stress was on letting God perform the actual vengeance, individuals sometimes imagined they might be called upon to take a more active role. This surfaced in the apocolyptic language of some patriarchal blessings. Others would make comments about not resting until God carried out vengeance. From the pulpit , the brethren held the entire nation responsible for letting mobocracy get out of control (Paul H. Peterson is a good reference for this.) These us-and-them sentiments existed apart from Joseph’s death, as the Saints had been repeatedly driven and persecuted. However, in my estimation, the oaths of members should have taught them to channel their righteous indignation into petitioning God and for them to work at constructively building up their Zion.

Conclusion

Endnotes

  1. [note] For a history of prayer circles, see D. Michael Quinn, "Latter-day Saint Prayer Circles," Brigham Young University Studies 19 no. 1 (Fall 1978), 79–105. PDF link
  2. [note] See his 21 December 1845 diary entry in The Nauvoo Endowment Companies, 1845–1846: A Documentary History, Richard Van Wagoner, Devery Scott Anderson, and Gary James Bergera, eds. (Salt Lake City: Signature Books, 2005).
  3. [note] Claire Noall, "The Plains of Warsaw," Utah Historical Quarterly 25:1 (January 1957), pp. 47–51.

Further reading

FAIR wiki articles

Latter-day Saint Temples/Endowment/Oath of vengeance

Temples of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints are sacred places where Church members participate in sacred ceremonies (ordinances) that help them come closer to God and prepare to live forever in an eternal family.

To view articles about Latter-day Saint temples, click "Expand" in the blue bar:

Articles about Latter-day Saint temples


Videos below from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.



FAIR web site

FAIR temple articles

External links

Template:TempleLinks

Printed material

Temple printed materials
  • Matthew B. Brown,The Gate of Heaven: Insight on the Doctrines and Symbols of the Temple (American Fork, UT: Covenant, 1999), 1.
  • Matthew B. Brown, Symbols in Stone: Symbolism on the Early Temples of the Restoration, 2d ed., (American Fork, UT: Covenant, 1997).
  • William J. Hamblin and David Seely, Solomon's Temple: Myth and History (London: Thames and Hudson, 2007), Chapter 3.
  • Hugh W. Nibley, The Message of the Joseph Smith Papyri: An Egyptian Endowment, 2nd edition, (Vol. 16 of the Collected Works of Hugh Nibley), edited by John Gee and Michael D. Rhodes, (Salt Lake City, Utah : Deseret Book Company ; Provo, Utah : Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 2005), 1. ISBN 159038539X. 1st edition GL direct link
  • Temple and Cosmos: Beyond This Ignorant Present (Vol. 12 of the Collected Works of Hugh Nibley), edited by Don E. Norton, (Salt Lake City, Utah : Deseret Book Company ; Provo, Utah : Foundation for Ancient Research and Mormon Studies, 1992), 1.
  • Boyd K. Packer, The Holy Temple (Salt Lake City, Utah: Bookcraft, 1980), 1. ISBN 0884944115.