FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Template:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:Apologists not official"
m (robot Adding: fr:Modèle:CriticalWork:Southerton:Losing:Repeat:Apologists not official) |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | {{appeal to emotion|The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage their arguments, but uses a variety of tactics to avoid or dismiss them. The author sometimes claims that "apologetic" answers are not endorsed or promoted by the Church (allowing him to suggest that either such answers don't count because they aren't "official," or such answers are radical and therefore ultimately unacceptable—and the Church knows it. | |
| − | + | ||
| − | + | Yet, the author ''knows'' that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on [[#185-186|p. 185-186]]. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website. There are also [[Apologetics#Does_the_Church_employ_or_pay_LDS_apologists.3F|other examples]] of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way. | |
| − | + | {{Repeat|l1=185-186|l2=202|l3=205|#185-186|#202b|#205}} | |
| − | + | }} | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
Latest revision as of 09:42, 26 November 2016
Logical Fallacy: Appeal to Emotion—The author attempts to manipulate the reader's emotional response instead of presenting a valid argument.
<The author wishes to discredit anything he labels "apologetic" (i.e., any work that might contest his naive and ill-informed reading of LDS scripture). He does not engage their arguments, but uses a variety of tactics to avoid or dismiss them. The author sometimes claims that "apologetic" answers are not endorsed or promoted by the Church (allowing him to suggest that either such answers don't count because they aren't "official," or such answers are radical and therefore ultimately unacceptable—and the Church knows it.Yet, the author knows that this claim is false, since he cites Jeff Lindsay on p. 185-186. Lindsay is an "apologist," and his work is cited by the Church's official website. There are also other examples of the Church using "apologetic" responses in a formal way.