Difference between revisions of "Question: Why doesn't God always heal the sick when they are given priesthood blessings?"

(Elder Oaks taught the scriptural message that some aren't healed because it isn't the will of the Lord)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
===Elder Oaks taught the scriptural message that some aren't healed because it isn't the will of the Lord===
 
===Elder Oaks taught the scriptural message that some aren't healed because it isn't the will of the Lord===
 +
 +
As {{s||D&C|42|48}} states, it is not always the will of the Lord for them to be healed:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
And again, it shall come to pass that he that hath faith in me to be healed, and is not appointed unto death, shall be healed.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
 +
Elder Oaks explained this very well:
 +
<blockquote>
 +
Faith is essential for healing by the powers of heaven. The Book of Mormon even teaches that “if there be no faith among the children of men God can do no miracle among them” (Ether 12:12).10 In a notable talk on administering to the sick, President Spencer W. Kimball said: “The need of faith is often underestimated. The ill one and the family often seem to depend wholly on the power of the priesthood and the gift of healing that they hope the administering brethren may have, whereas the greater responsibility is with him who is blessed. … The major element is the faith of the individual when that person is conscious and accountable. ‘Thy faith hath made thee whole’ [Matthew 9:22] was repeated so often by the Master that it almost became a chorus.” <ref>Dallin H. Oaks, "Healing the Sick," General Conference Priesthood Session (April 2010).</ref>
 +
</blockquote>
  
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>

Revision as of 09:50, 19 October 2016

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Question: Why doesn't God always heal the sick when they are given priesthood blessings?

Sometimes God allows us to be His hand in helping to alleviate suffering

Many people ask whether God intervenes in our lives. It is true that he does from time to time. But, perhaps a more important question is whether we are intervening in each others' lives. Should we pray that God will heal the sick? Yes. But, more importantly, do we visit the sick and administer to their relief? Should we pray that God will alleviate the suffering of the poor? Yes. But, more importantly, are we doing something to help alleviate the suffering? Perhaps God is more concerned with what we are doing to intervene than with intervening himself.

Elder Oaks taught the scriptural message that some aren't healed because it isn't the will of the Lord

As D&C 42꞉48 states, it is not always the will of the Lord for them to be healed:

And again, it shall come to pass that he that hath faith in me to be healed, and is not appointed unto death, shall be healed.

Elder Oaks explained this very well:

Faith is essential for healing by the powers of heaven. The Book of Mormon even teaches that “if there be no faith among the children of men God can do no miracle among them” (Ether 12:12).10 In a notable talk on administering to the sick, President Spencer W. Kimball said: “The need of faith is often underestimated. The ill one and the family often seem to depend wholly on the power of the priesthood and the gift of healing that they hope the administering brethren may have, whereas the greater responsibility is with him who is blessed. … The major element is the faith of the individual when that person is conscious and accountable. ‘Thy faith hath made thee whole’ [Matthew 9:22] was repeated so often by the Master that it almost became a chorus.” [1]


Notes

  1. Dallin H. Oaks, "Healing the Sick," General Conference Priesthood Session (April 2010).