Revision as of 10:57, 2 May 2015 (view source) GregSmith (talk | contribs) m ← Older edit		Revision as of 15:53, 10 July 2016 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) Newer edit →
Line 29:		Line 29:
	{{Articles Footer 1}}		{{Articles Footer 1}}
		+	<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
		+	[[en:Mormonism and doctrine/Doctrine of the past]]
	[[es:El Mormonismo y la doctrina/La doctrina del pasado]]		[[es:El Mormonismo y la doctrina/La doctrina del pasado]]
	[[pt:Mormonismo e Doutrina/Doutrina do passado]]		[[pt:Mormonismo e Doutrina/Doutrina do passado]]

---

Revision as of 15:53, 10 July 2016

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Mormon doctrine of the past

Topics

Mormon doctrine of the past

Statements by past prophets

Summary: Are statements of past prophets considered doctrine? It is claimed that anything that is, or ever was, officially published by the Church ought to represent doctrine.

Prophets are not infallible

Summary: Are prophets considered infallible? Critics sometimes impose absolutist assumptions on the Church and hold inerrantist beliefs about scriptures or prophets. Critics therefore insist that any statement by any LDS Church leader represents LDS doctrine and is thus something that is secretly believed, or that should be believed, by Latter-day Saints.

The Law of Adoption

Summary: Critics point to the early practice of sealing men and women as children to prominent LDS leaders as an example of changes in LDS belief.