Difference between revisions of "Question: Were the Lectures on Faith revelations?"

(Question: Were the Lectures on Faith revelations?)
(Question: Were the Lectures on Faith revelations?)
Line 17: Line 17:
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
{{endnotes sources}}
 
[[Category:The Changing World of Mormonism]]
 
[[Category:The Changing World of Mormonism]]
 +
 +
 +
<!-- PLEASE DO NOT REMOVE ANYTHING BELOW THIS LINE -->
 +
[[en:Question: Were the Lectures on Faith revelations?]]
 +
[[pt:Pergunta: Foram as Palestras sobre Fé na verdade revelações?]]

Revision as of 22:27, 2 February 2016

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Question: Were the Lectures on Faith revelations?

The Lectures were not revelations

Even hostile readers in 1838 understood that there was a distinct difference between the Lectures and the revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants:

The first part [of the D&C] contains seven lectures on Faith, but the second is of most importance, containing what are termed, “Covenants and Commandments of the Lord, to his servants of the Church of the Latter Day Saints.” This part includes one hundred and two sections, ninety-seven of which are occupied by as many professed revelations.[1]

Bruce R. McConkie wrote regarding the lectures, "They were not themselves classed as revelations, but in them is to be found some of the best lesson material ever prepared on the Godhead; on the character, perfections, and attributes of God; on faith, miracles, and sacrifice. They can be studied with great profit by all gospel scholars."[2] The 1990 republication of the Lectures signals the desire of some LDS scholars to stimulate interest in their historical and doctrinal significance for the Church.


Notes

  1. La Roy Sunderland, “Mormonism,” Zion’s Watchman (New York) 3, no. 2 (13 January 1838): 6. off-site
  2. Bruce R. McConkie, "Lectures on Faith," in Mormon Doctrine, 2nd edition, (Salt Lake City: Bookcraft, 1966), 439. GL direct link