Revision as of 08:23, 19 July 2014 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (m) ← Older edit		Revision as of 08:24, 19 July 2014 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (m) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}		{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
−	{{Resource Title|Doctrine and Covenants}}	+	{{Resource Title|Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants}}
	{{summary}}		{{summary}}
	== ==		== ==

---

Revision as of 08:24, 19 July 2014

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants

Topics

Criticism of the Doctrine and Covenants

Contradiction between Section 132 and Jacob 2

Summary: Critics note that D&C 132 speaks favorably about some Old Testament practitioners of plural marriage, while Jacob 2 is negative. Some claim that this discrepancy is a contradiction, suggesting that Joseph Smith's ideas about plural marriage changed, and the Book of Mormon and Doctrine and Covenants are not inspired.

D&C 84 states that God cannot be seen without priesthood

Summary: How could Joseph Smith has seen God the Father and Jesus Christ during the First Vision if he had not yet received the priesthood?