Difference between revisions of "The Bible/Science"

(mm)
(: m)
Line 19: Line 19:
 
|subject=Flood, global or local
 
|subject=Flood, global or local
 
|summary=Modern scientific knowledge regarding the diversity of species, language and evidence of continuous human habitation does not support the Biblical story that a global flood wiped out most life as recently as 4,400 years ago
 
|summary=Modern scientific knowledge regarding the diversity of species, language and evidence of continuous human habitation does not support the Biblical story that a global flood wiped out most life as recently as 4,400 years ago
 +
}}
 +
{{SummaryItem
 +
|link=Mormonism and science/Did Adam and Eve really exist
 +
|subject=Did Adam and Eve really exist
 +
|summary=Do Latter-day Saints believe that Adam and Eve were real?
 
}}
 
}}
 
</onlyinclude>
 
</onlyinclude>

Revision as of 09:16, 1 July 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Science and the Bible

Topics


Science and the Bible


Archaeology and the Bible

Summary: Sectarian critics who accept the Bible, but not the Book of Mormon, sometimes claim that the Bible has been "proven" or "confirmed" by archaeology, and insist that the same cannot be said for the Book of Mormon.

Flood, global or local

Summary: Modern scientific knowledge regarding the diversity of species, language and evidence of continuous human habitation does not support the Biblical story that a global flood wiped out most life as recently as 4,400 years ago

Did Adam and Eve really exist

Summary: Do Latter-day Saints believe that Adam and Eve were real?