Difference between revisions of "Question: Did Joseph Smith offer to trade Jane Law for Emma Smith in a wife swap with William Law?"

m
m
Line 33: Line 33:
  
  
{{HalesSite|title1=Joseph H. Jackson as an Accuser|link1=http://www.josephsmithspolygamy.com/JSImproperProposals/16ImproperProposalsAccusations/JaneLaw5.html|summary1=Test summ1
+
{{HalesSite|title1=Joseph H. Jackson as an Accuser|link1=http://www.josephsmithspolygamy.com/JSImproperProposals/16ImproperProposalsAccusations/JaneLaw5.html|summary1=
|title2=Testing 2|link2=http://www.google.com|summary2=Sum 2|title3=Testing 3|link3=http://www.google.com|summary3=Three}}
+
|title2=|link2=http://www.google.com|summary2=Sum 2|title3=Testing 3|link3=http://www.google.com|summary3=}}
  
 
== ==
 
== ==

Revision as of 13:30, 17 June 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Was Emma was promised "annihilation" if she didn't accept plural marriage?

Important introductory material on plural marriage available here

Answers portal
Plural marriage
Plural marriage1.jpg
Resources.icon.tiny.1.png    RESOURCES

Joseph Smith era:


Post-Joseph Smith:


Post-Manifesto–present

Perspectives.icon.tiny.1.png    PERSPECTIVES
Media.icon.tiny.1.png    MEDIA
Resources.icon.tiny.1.png    OTHER PORTALS

Questions

Did Joseph Smith offer to trade Jane Law for Emma Smith in a wife swap with William Law?

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]

Answer


This claim rests on a single, unreliable hostile source. Other hostile sources (including William Law) deny the tale.

Detailed Analysis

This question arises because of a somewhat opaque verse in the Doctrine and Covenants section on plural marriage. (The revelation was written down at Hyrum Smith's request, who believed that he could persuade Emma Smith of the doctrine's provenance from God.) The verses in question read:

51 Verily, I say unto you: A commandment I give unto mine handmaid, Emma Smith, your wife, whom I have given unto you, that she stay herself and partake not of that which I commanded you to offer unto her; for I did it, saith the Lord, to prove you all, as I did Abraham, and that I might require an offering at your hand, by covenant and sacrifice....54 And I command mine handmaid, Emma Smith, to abide and cleave unto my servant Joseph, and to none else. (D&C 132꞉51,54.

No one is certain as to what this refers. William Clayton, Joseph's scribe and secretary, wrote in his contemporaneous journal:

This A.M. President Joseph took me and conversed considerable concerning some delicate matters. Said [Emma] wanted to lay a snare for me. He told me last night of this and said he had felt troubled. He said [Emma] had treated him coldly and badly since I came…and he knew she was disposed to be revenged on him for some things. She thought that if he would indulge himself she would too.[1]

Some have seen this as Emma claiming she would practice plural marriage (a strange idea, given how she felt about it), and these readers have then extended the reading to include a belief that she was threatening to marry William Law. Others have seen these verses (perhaps more plausibly) as Emma simply threatening divorce if Joseph didn't cease plural marriage. In this reading, Joseph would have agreed to a divorce--both were probably speaking somewhat in the heat of the moment—and the Lord in D&C 132 makes it clear that he does not endorse Joseph's offer of (or agreement to) a divorce.

The idea of Joseph offering William Law to Emma springs out of an anti-Mormon work. As D. Carmon Hardy noted:

Belief that the prophet contemplated a 'spiritual swop' of wives with William Law, based on Joseph Jackson's statement in his exaggerated Narrative, 20–21, should be viewed with caution. The best review of the matter remains Newell and Avery, Mormon Enigma, 176–77.[2]

It becomes clear how shaky the evidence is when one drills down to the ultimate source of the idea. The source of this charge seems to be a book by Joseph H. Jackson.[3]. Jackson claimed to have insinuated himself into Joseph's counsels, and claimed Joseph had told him that he was going to attempt to "get Mrs. William Law for a spiritual wife…for the purpose of affecting his object [Joseph] got up a revelation that Law was to be sealed up to Emma, and that Law's wife was to be his; in other words there was to be a spiritual swop [sic]…[Joseph] had never before suffered his passion for any woman to carry him so far as to be willing to sacrifice Emma for its gratification."


See also Brian Hales' discussion

Notes

  1. William Clayton and George D. Smith (editor), An Intimate Chronicle: The Journals of William Clayton (Salt Lake City, Utah: Signature Books, 1995), 108 (entry dated 23 June 1843).
  2. B. Carmon Hardy, Doing the Works of Abraham, 65, note 99.
  3. Joseph H. Jackson, The Adventures and Experiences of Joseph H. Jackson in Nauvoo, (Printed for the Publisher: Warsaw, Illinois, 1846), 21.


Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims