Difference between revisions of "Plural marriage/Did President Gordon B. Hinckley state that polygamy was not doctrinal"

(m)
(m)
Line 40: Line 40:
  
 
{{Articles Footer 1}}
 
{{Articles Footer 1}}
 +
 +
[[Category:Letter to a CES Director]]

Revision as of 21:20, 24 May 2014

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Did President Gordon B. Hinckley state that polygamy was not doctrinal

Questions


Gordon B. Hinckley made the following statement on Larry King Live on September 8, 1998 with regard to the practice of polygamy:

I condemn it [polygamy], yes, as a practice, because I think it is not doctrinal. It is not legal. And this church takes the position that we will abide by the law. We believe in being subject to kings, presidents, rulers, magistrates in honoring, obeying and sustaining the law.

  • How can President Hinckley claim that polygamy is "not doctrinal" if it was a required practice in the 19th-Century Church?
  • Is it a lie to say that polygamy is not doctrinal?
  • Was President Hinckley unaware of why polygamy was practiced in the early Church?
  • Was President Hinckley attempting to convince everyone that polygamy was legal in the 19th-Century?

Gospel Topics on LDS.org, "Plural Marriage and Families in Early Utah"

Gospel Topics on LDS.org, (2013)
After the Manifesto, monogamy was advocated in the Church both over the pulpit and through the press. On an exceptional basis, some new plural marriages were performed between 1890 and 1904, especially in Mexico and Canada, outside the jurisdiction of U.S. law; a small number of plural marriages were performed within the United States during those years. In 1904, the Church strictly prohibited new plural marriages. Today, any person who practices plural marriage cannot become or remain a member of the Church.

Click here to view the complete article

Answer


Despite the fact that rules regarding polygamy are outlined in D&C 132, the Church no longer teaches it as doctrine. It was taught as doctrine in the 1800's, it is not taught as doctrine today. There is no doctrine that allows the present practice of plural marriage in the Church. Its practice is "not doctrinal."

Polygamy is illegal today, and Church policy is to respect the law on the matter. For most of the practice of plural marriage, the Church fought the anti-polygamy laws, and regarded them as violations of the Constitution. Any decision to disobey secular law for conscience sake must be specifically commanded by the Church's leaders. At present, that has not happened.

Many constitutional law scholars--LDS and non-LDS--regard the Supreme Court decisions on the legality of plural marriage as clearly biased and motivated by religious prejudice. The nineteenth century Saints had good grounds for believing that the law was unjust and would eventually be overturned. [1]

Notes


  1. Gregory L. Smith, "Polygamy, Prophets, and Prevarication: Frequently and Rarely Asked Questions about the Initiation, Practice, and Cessation of Plural Marriage in The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints," FAIR, 2005. describes these issues in detail.