Revision as of 07:55, 13 September 2013 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (mod) ← Older edit		Revision as of 17:53, 30 November 2013 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (m) Newer edit →
Line 14:		Line 14:
	|link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial/Con man		|link=Joseph Smith/Legal issues/Trials/1826 glasslooking trial/Con man
	|subject=Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?		|subject=Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?
−	|summary=Critics claim that Joseph was a "con man," and that he was found guilty of being such in a court of law. This refers to the 1826 trial.	+	|summary=It is claimed that Joseph was a "con man," and that he was found guilty of being such in a court of law. This refers to the 1826 trial.
	}}		}}
	{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}		{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}

---

Revision as of 17:53, 30 November 2013

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Joseph Smith legal issues: Trials

Answers portal
Joseph Smith, Jr.
RESOURCES
Martyrdom Healings and miracles Priesthood restore date Alleged false prophecies
Legal trials 1826 trial Kirtland Safety Society Nauvoo city charter Nauvoo Expositor The Council of Fifty The Hurlbut affidavits Politics
"Amusing recitals"/Tall Tales? Occultism and magic Jupiter talisman Masonic distress cry Treasure seeking Seer stones
As Holy Ghost? Personal failings Boastful about the Church? Role in LDS belief
PERSPECTIVES
Joseph Smith’s Visions: His Style and his Record
MEDIA
OTHER PORTALS
First Vision Book of Mormon Plural marriage Temples

Topics

1826 trial for "glasslooking"

Summary: Joseph Smith was brought to trial in 1826 for "glasslooking." Didn't Hugh Nibley claim that if this trial record existed that it would be "the most damning evidence in existence against Joseph Smith?"

• • Was Joseph found guilty of being a "con man"?—
    Brief Summary: It is claimed that Joseph was a "con man," and that he was found guilty of being such in a court of law. This refers to the 1826 trial. (Click here for full article)
    ∗       ∗       ∗