|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
| + | #REDIRECT [[Main Page]] |
| − | {{Resource Title|Response to questions about the priesthood ban}}
| |
| − | {{FAIRAnalysisHeader
| |
| − | |title=[[../|Questions Asked at 2010 Swedish Fireside]]
| |
| − | |author=
| |
| − | |noauthor=
| |
| − | |section=
| |
| − | |previous=[[../11|Response to questions about angelic visitations]]
| |
| − | |next=[[../13|Response to questions about temple concerns]]
| |
| − | |notes=
| |
| − | }}
| |
| − | {{Swedish questions quick jump}}
| |
| − | ==== ====
| |
| − | {{QuestionItem
| |
| − | |claim=[In reading] about the priesthood and the blacks.
| |
| − | *David O. McKay .... he had made OK that they should have the priesthood. But three of the apostles were not there and when they come back, they said no.
| |
| − | *Is this true that there were some apostles that went against the question to give the priesthood to the Blacks?
| |
| − | *Mark E Peterson....talks a lot about the blacks and the pre-existence and they are damned and so on because they were black.
| |
| − | |answer=
| |
| − | *'''Question: If David O. McKay was in favor of lifting the priesthood ban, why didn't he?<br>Answer: There is a period of studying it out in the mind prior to receiving revelation.'''
| |
| − | <blockquote>
| |
| − | David O. McKay blacks and the priesthood. The June 1978 revelation has a history to it like all revelations. You have this period of time in which saints are studying it out in the mind and they eventually flower as revelation.<br>
| |
| − | :::—Brother Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − | *'''Question: Why did some of the apostles disagree about lifting the priesthood ban?<br>Answer: We don't know.'''
| |
| − | <blockquote>
| |
| − | It’s possible. I think it would be entirely consistent with the way things are done. Does that make sense?<br>
| |
| − | :::—Brother Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.
| |
| − | </blockquote>
| |
| − | }}
| |
