Difference between revisions of "User:InProgress/SWDN/Swedish questions/7"

(Created page with "{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Head...")
 
m
Line 4: Line 4:
 
{{Swedish questions quick jump}}
 
{{Swedish questions quick jump}}
 
{{parabreak}}
 
{{parabreak}}
 +
 +
==== ====
 +
{{QuestionItem
 +
|claim=
 +
*Blood atonement. It’s just a strange thing altogether in my view.
 +
*How many years was it practiced during this time?
 +
*Did anybody die with blood atonement?
 +
|answer=
 +
*'''Question: Did the Church practice blood atonement?<br>Answer: Church leaders associated it with capital punishment.'''
 +
<blockquote>
 +
My personal belief is that during Joseph Smith’s time period, based on statements in the bible, Joseph Smith said that when men shed blood, their blood should be shed. He’s talking about scripture. And I think that when you got into the Brigham Young times, that scripture was taken literally for a time [because] leaders taught that if people killed, then they deserved capital punishment. That [yeah] Old Testament-style event. [And t]hat sort of bounces around in the 1850s in particular when people are talking about, well how do you do this, you know? Is it literal? How do you shed a person’s blood in the process of capital punishment? And it gets to the late 1870s when they’re basically saying to people, hey look our belief on this is the same belief that other people have who believe in capital punishment. Now that’s, [that's] my very rapid historical summary of it.<br>
 +
&mdash;Elder Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
*'''Question: What is the Church's position on blood atonement?<br>Answer: The Church states that blood atonement is not necessary.'''
 +
<blockquote>
 +
From a church standpoint, blood atonement, meaning that it’s required for people to have their blood shed when they commit capital crimes, the church has gone on record saying that’s not necessary. So that’s the church position on it.<br>
 +
&mdash;Elder Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.
 +
</blockquote>
 +
}}

Revision as of 23:12, 13 October 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

A FairMormon Response to Questions Asked in Swedish Fireside with Elder's Jensen and Turley

1: BoM translation—2: Polygamy and Polyandry—3: Polygamy forced?—4: Book of Abraham—5: "Lying for Lord"—6: Mark Hofmann—7: Blood atonement—8: First Vision—9: Sanitized history—10: "Not all truth is useful"—11: Angelic affidavits—12: Blacks and priesthood—13: Temple concerns—14: Evidence of Vikings—15: Adam-God—16: Kinderhook

∗       ∗       ∗

Question:
  • Blood atonement. It’s just a strange thing altogether in my view.
  • How many years was it practiced during this time?
  • Did anybody die with blood atonement?

Short Answer:
  • Question: Did the Church practice blood atonement?
    Answer: Church leaders associated it with capital punishment.

My personal belief is that during Joseph Smith’s time period, based on statements in the bible, Joseph Smith said that when men shed blood, their blood should be shed. He’s talking about scripture. And I think that when you got into the Brigham Young times, that scripture was taken literally for a time [because] leaders taught that if people killed, then they deserved capital punishment. That [yeah] Old Testament-style event. [And t]hat sort of bounces around in the 1850s in particular when people are talking about, well how do you do this, you know? Is it literal? How do you shed a person’s blood in the process of capital punishment? And it gets to the late 1870s when they’re basically saying to people, hey look our belief on this is the same belief that other people have who believe in capital punishment. Now that’s, [that's] my very rapid historical summary of it.
—Elder Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.

  • Question: What is the Church's position on blood atonement?
    Answer: The Church states that blood atonement is not necessary.

From a church standpoint, blood atonement, meaning that it’s required for people to have their blood shed when they commit capital crimes, the church has gone on record saying that’s not necessary. So that’s the church position on it.
—Elder Turley's response to this question at the Sweden fireside.



Retrieved from "https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/answers/index.php?title=User:InProgress/SWDN/Swedish_questions/7&oldid=107093"