Difference between revisions of "Book of Abraham/Plagiarism accusations"

({{Subarticles label}}: typo)
(mod)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
 
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
 
{{summary}}
 
{{summary}}
 +
== ==
 +
{{Criticism label}}
  
=={{Criticism label}}==
 
 
Critics look to numerous contemporary sources to explain how Joseph Smith was able to produce the Book of Abraham.  
 
Critics look to numerous contemporary sources to explain how Joseph Smith was able to produce the Book of Abraham.  
  
 
{{CriticalSources}}
 
{{CriticalSources}}
  
=={{Subarticles label}}==
+
== ==
 +
{{Subarticles label}}
 +
 
 
The following contemporary sources are claimed by various critics to be sources for the Book of Abraham.
 
The following contemporary sources are claimed by various critics to be sources for the Book of Abraham.
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem

Revision as of 22:49, 17 September 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Questions


Critics look to numerous contemporary sources to explain how Joseph Smith was able to produce the Book of Abraham.

To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here

Sub-articles



The following contemporary sources are claimed by various critics to be sources for the Book of Abraham.

Genesis

Josephus

Philosophy of a Future State by Thomas Dick

Summary: Critics claim that Joseph Smith's theology as described in the Book of Abraham was influenced by Thomas Dick's book The Philosophy of a Future State.