FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Mormon Reformation"
(link) |
(mod) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}} | {{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}} | ||
| + | {{Resource Title|The Mormon Reformation}} | ||
{{summary}} | {{summary}} | ||
| − | + | == == | |
| − | = | + | {{Criticism label}} |
| − | + | ||
The "Mormon Reformation" was a reform or spiritual rejuvenation movement that began among the Utah Saints in the mid-1850s. Ironically, noted one historian, "[m]ore has been written about its excesses (real and imaginary) than about what actually happened. Stenhouse's anonymous chapter on the Reformation and Blood Atonement was typical. Even church historian B. H. Roberts devoted twice as much space in discussing blood atonement in connection with the reform movement than he did to the Reformation itself."{{ref|larson.45.46}} | The "Mormon Reformation" was a reform or spiritual rejuvenation movement that began among the Utah Saints in the mid-1850s. Ironically, noted one historian, "[m]ore has been written about its excesses (real and imaginary) than about what actually happened. Stenhouse's anonymous chapter on the Reformation and Blood Atonement was typical. Even church historian B. H. Roberts devoted twice as much space in discussing blood atonement in connection with the reform movement than he did to the Reformation itself."{{ref|larson.45.46}} | ||
{{CriticalSources}} | {{CriticalSources}} | ||
| − | < | + | == == |
| + | {{Topics label}} | ||
| + | |||
| + | <onlyinclude> | ||
==History of the Mormon Reformation== | ==History of the Mormon Reformation== | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
Revision as of 08:23, 16 September 2013
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Contents
- 1 The Mormon Reformation
- 1.1
- 1.2 Questions
- 1.3
- 1.4 Topics
- 1.5 History of the Mormon Reformation
- 1.6 Doctrine taught during the Reformation
- 1.7 Critical claims related to the Reformation
- 1.7.1 19th century crimes alleged to be "worthy of death"
- 1.7.2 Brigham Young: "bowie knife" (JD 1:83)
- 1.7.3 Brigham Young: "cut their throats" (JD 2:311)
- 1.7.4 Brigham Young: "cutting off from the earth" (JD 4:53)
- 1.7.5 Brigham Young: "killing the evil doers" (JD 3:50}
- 1.7.6 Brigham Young: "meanest devils" (JD 6:176)
- 1.7.7 Brigham Young: murder unfaithful Mormons to save souls? (JD 4:219-20)
- 1.7.8 Brigham Young: dictator? (JD 14:205)
- 1.7.9 Brigham Young: President of the US?
- 1.7.10 Danites
- 1.7.11 Surveyor general David H. Burr threatened with death
- 1.8 Events related to the Reformation
- 1.9
- 1.10 Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims
The Mormon Reformation
Questions
The "Mormon Reformation" was a reform or spiritual rejuvenation movement that began among the Utah Saints in the mid-1850s. Ironically, noted one historian, "[m]ore has been written about its excesses (real and imaginary) than about what actually happened. Stenhouse's anonymous chapter on the Reformation and Blood Atonement was typical. Even church historian B. H. Roberts devoted twice as much space in discussing blood atonement in connection with the reform movement than he did to the Reformation itself."[1]
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]
Topics
History of the Mormon Reformation
Historical background
Doctrine taught during the Reformation
Blood atonement
Summary: Critics claim that during the administration of Brigham Young apostates were secretly put to death. They claim this is in line with the teachings of LDS leaders at the time that apostasy was the unforgivable sin, and that the only thing an apostate could do to redeem himself was to give his own life, willingly or unwillingly.Brigham Young's preaching style
Summary: Critics have often misunderstood or misrepresented Brigham Young's (and others LDS preachers') preaching style19th century crimes alleged to be "worthy of death"
Summary: Critics expand to idea of blood atonement to include a long list of crimes that were alleged to be "worthy of death."Brigham Young: "bowie knife" (JD 1:83)
Brigham Young: "cut their throats" (JD 2:311)
Brigham Young: "cutting off from the earth" (JD 4:53)
Brigham Young: "killing the evil doers" (JD 3:50}
Brigham Young: "meanest devils" (JD 6:176)
Brigham Young: murder unfaithful Mormons to save souls? (JD 4:219-20)
Brigham Young: dictator? (JD 14:205)
Brigham Young: President of the US?
Danites
Surveyor general David H. Burr threatened with death
Castration of sinners in Utah?
Summary: I have read about a group of men (LDS) that went around castrating immoral men (who were also LDS) with the express permission of local church leaders. These events supposedly happened during the Brigham Young's administration. It is claimed that Brigham was aware of and approved of this and may have given the order. What can you tell me about this? I read that missionaries who selected plural wives from female converts before allowing church leaders to select from them first were castrated.Mountain Meadows Massacre
Summary: In September 1857 a group of Mormons in southern Utah killed all adult members of an Arkansas wagon train that was headed for California. Critics charge that the massacre was typical of Mormon "culture of violence," and claim that Church leaders—possibly as high as Brigham Young—approved of, or even ordered the killing.- Prosecution—
Brief Summary: Critics charge that Brigham Young blocked prosecution of those who committed the Mountain Meadows Massacre. (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗ - Thomas Kane—
Brief Summary: Critics who use the Mountain Meadows Massacre to attack the Church often mention non-LDS Col. Thomas Kane. Kane was a good friend to the Mormons prior to Joseph Smith's death, and he was also briefly involved in the Massacre issue. (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗
- Prosecution—
Oath of vengeance
Summary: In nearly every anti-Mormon discussion of the temple, critics raise the issue of the "oath of vengeance" that existed during the 19th century and very early 20th century. These critics often misstate the nature of the oath and try to use its presence in the early temple endowment as evidence that the LDS temple ceremonies are ungodly, violent, and immoral.
==
Notes
==
- [note] Gustave O. Larson, "The Mormon Reformation," Utah Historical Quarterly 26/1 (January 1958): 45–46.