Difference between revisions of "Template:Antispeak"

(mod)
(mod)
Line 10: Line 10:
 
| loaded= '''Loaded language''' —Critics often use negative terms, biased language, or casual terms to make LDS matters seem bizarre, evil, or absurd.
 
| loaded= '''Loaded language''' —Critics often use negative terms, biased language, or casual terms to make LDS matters seem bizarre, evil, or absurd.
 
| liars= '''Liars''' —Critics often assume or claim that LDS leaders or members are lying or dishonest.  They do not consider or grant that even if they are in error, they might have made an error innocently or unintentionally. Any error (real or perceived) is evidence of ''lying''.
 
| liars= '''Liars''' —Critics often assume or claim that LDS leaders or members are lying or dishonest.  They do not consider or grant that even if they are in error, they might have made an error innocently or unintentionally. Any error (real or perceived) is evidence of ''lying''.
|mocking='''Mocking language and hyperbole'''—The critic uses hyperbole to mock believers.
+
|mocking='''Mocking language and hyperbole'''—The critic intentionally exaggerates claims in order to mock believers.
 
|mutually exclusive='''Mutually exclusive claims'''—When critics need an attack against the Church, ''any'' excuse will do, even if they are mutually self-contradictory: if one argument is true, the other cannot be. They hope we don't notice that an internally consistent story is not being told.
 
|mutually exclusive='''Mutually exclusive claims'''—When critics need an attack against the Church, ''any'' excuse will do, even if they are mutually self-contradictory: if one argument is true, the other cannot be. They hope we don't notice that an internally consistent story is not being told.
 
| repeat = '''Repetition''' —Critics often repeat the same claim again and again, as if repetition improved their argument. Or, they use the same 'shock-quote' multiple times.
 
| repeat = '''Repetition''' —Critics often repeat the same claim again and again, as if repetition improved their argument. Or, they use the same 'shock-quote' multiple times.

Revision as of 00:24, 8 May 2012