Difference between revisions of "Christian revival"

(Topics: mod)
(mod)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
 
{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
 +
{{Resource Title|Christian revival}}
 
{{summary}}
 
{{summary}}
 +
 +
== ==
 +
{{Topics label}}
 
<onlyinclude>
 
<onlyinclude>
=[[Christian revival]]=
 
==Topics==
 
 
{{SummaryItem
 
{{SummaryItem
 
|link=First Vision/Accounts/1832/Doesn't mention a revival
 
|link=First Vision/Accounts/1832/Doesn't mention a revival

Revision as of 12:46, 24 September 2013

  1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Christian revival


Topics


1832 First Vision account doesn't mention a revival

Summary: A religious revival is not mentioned in Joseph Smith's handwritten 1832 First Vision account. Since this detail does not show up in the narrative until the 1838 'official text' critics claim that it provides evidence that the First Vision story evolved over time and became more elaborate.

Were there revivals in 1820?

Summary: Critics claim that there were no religious revivals in the Palmyra, New York area in 1820, contrary to Joseph Smith's claims that during that year there was "an unusual excitement on the subject of religion...indeed, the whole district of country seemed affected by it"