Revision as of 21:40, 4 May 2011 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (→‎{{Topics label}}: mod) ← Older edit		Revision as of 20:59, 2 September 2013 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (mod) Newer edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}		{{Articles FAIR copyright}} {{Articles Header 1}} {{Articles Header 2}} {{Articles Header 3}} {{Articles Header 4}} {{Articles Header 5}} {{Articles Header 6}} {{Articles Header 7}} {{Articles Header 8}} {{Articles Header 9}} {{Articles Header 10}}
−		+	{{Resource Title|The "Joseph Smith Translation" of the Bible}}
	{{Summary}}		{{Summary}}
	<onlyinclude>		<onlyinclude>

---

Revision as of 20:59, 2 September 2013

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

The "Joseph Smith Translation" of the Bible

Joseph Smith Translation (JST) articles

==

Topics

==

Joseph Smith Translation as a restoration of the original Bible text

Summary: If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these corrections not match known Biblical manuscripts?

As the Church's official Bible

Summary: Why don't Latter-day Saints use the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible as the "official" Bible instead of the King James Version.

JST an embarrassment to leaders?

Summary: Critics claim that the Church is "embarrassed" by the Joseph Smith Translation.

Relationship of the JST to the Book of Mormon

Summary: Some passages from the Bible (parts of Isaiah, for example) were included in the Book of Mormon text. However, the same passages were later revised for the Joseph Smith Translation of the Holy Bible. In some cases these passages are not rendered identically. Critics claim that if the JST was an accurate translation, it would match the supposedly more 'pure' Isaiah text possessed by the Nephites.