FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "The Bible"
m (moved Bible to Mormonism and the Bible) |
(links) |
||
Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
==Biblical accuracy== | ==Biblical accuracy== | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Inerrancy | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Inerrancy |
|subject=Inerrancy and the Bible | |subject=Inerrancy and the Bible | ||
|summary=Critics claim the Bible texts, at least in their pristine form, were inerrant. Therefore, it is incorrect for Joseph Smith to teach that the Bible contains errors, mistakes, or omissions. | |summary=Critics claim the Bible texts, at least in their pristine form, were inerrant. Therefore, it is incorrect for Joseph Smith to teach that the Bible contains errors, mistakes, or omissions. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Textual criticism | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Textual criticism |
|subject=Textual criticism | |subject=Textual criticism | ||
|summary=What can textual criticism tell us about the Bible? Does it have anything to say about the Bible being without error, as some Christians claim? | |summary=What can textual criticism tell us about the Bible? Does it have anything to say about the Bible being without error, as some Christians claim? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Translations | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Translations |
|subject=Translations | |subject=Translations | ||
|summary=The Church insists on using the Authorized ("King James") Version as its official Bible, even though more modern translations are easier to read, are more accurate, and include more recent manuscript discoveries. Critics sometimes complain that the eight Article of Faith about believing the Bible "as far as it is translated correctly," implies that Bible translators are trying to hide God's truth. | |summary=The Church insists on using the Authorized ("King James") Version as its official Bible, even though more modern translations are easier to read, are more accurate, and include more recent manuscript discoveries. Critics sometimes complain that the eight Article of Faith about believing the Bible "as far as it is translated correctly," implies that Bible translators are trying to hide God's truth. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Transmission versus translation | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Transmission versus translation |
|subject=Transmission versus translation | |subject=Transmission versus translation | ||
|summary=Critics try to show that by the term translation in the eighth Article of Faith, we really mean transmission. | |summary=Critics try to show that by the term translation in the eighth Article of Faith, we really mean transmission. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Trustworthy | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Trustworthy |
|subject=Trustworthy? | |subject=Trustworthy? | ||
|summary=Critics claim that Latter-day Saint leaders diminish the Bible as untrustworthy. | |summary=Critics claim that Latter-day Saint leaders diminish the Bible as untrustworthy. | ||
Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
==Biblical completeness== | ==Biblical completeness== | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Completeness | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Completeness |
|subject=Completeness and sufficiency | |subject=Completeness and sufficiency | ||
|summary=Critics claim the Bible contains all necessary or essential knowledge to assure salvation. Therefore, things like modern prophets or additional scripture (such as the Book of Mormon) are unnecessary or even blasphemous. | |summary=Critics claim the Bible contains all necessary or essential knowledge to assure salvation. Therefore, things like modern prophets or additional scripture (such as the Book of Mormon) are unnecessary or even blasphemous. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/%22Adding_to%22_or_%22taking_away_from%22 | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/%22Adding_to%22_or_%22taking_away_from%22 |
|subject="Adding to" or "taking away" from the Bible | |subject="Adding to" or "taking away" from the Bible | ||
|summary=Critics claim that the Book of Mormon cannot be true because nothing should be "added to" or "taken away from" the Holy Bible. | |summary=Critics claim that the Book of Mormon cannot be true because nothing should be "added to" or "taken away from" the Holy Bible. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Inerrancy | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Inerrancy |
|subject=Biblical inerrancy | |subject=Biblical inerrancy | ||
|summary=Does the Bible teach that it is "inerrant"? Is this an idea with any meaning? | |summary=Does the Bible teach that it is "inerrant"? Is this an idea with any meaning? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Insufficient | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Insufficient |
|subject=Insufficient? | |subject=Insufficient? | ||
|summary=Critics interpret a statement by Orson Pratt to mean that Latter-day Saints believe that the Bible is "insufficient." | |summary=Critics interpret a statement by Orson Pratt to mean that Latter-day Saints believe that the Bible is "insufficient." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Lost scripture | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Lost scripture |
|subject=Lost scripture | |subject=Lost scripture | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Open canon vs. closed canon | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Open canon vs. closed canon |
|subject=Open canon vs. closed canon | |subject=Open canon vs. closed canon | ||
}} | }} | ||
Line 70: | Line 70: | ||
==Biblical interpretation by Latter-day Saints and critics== | ==Biblical interpretation by Latter-day Saints and critics== | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Born again translation | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Born again translation |
|subject=Being "born again"—what does the Bible mean? | |subject=Being "born again"—what does the Bible mean? | ||
|summary=When the Bible talks about being "born again," what does this mean? How did the first Christians understand this concept? | |summary=When the Bible talks about being "born again," what does this mean? How did the first Christians understand this concept? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Christianity is a mystery | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Christianity is a mystery |
|subject=Christianity is a mystery | |subject=Christianity is a mystery | ||
|summary=Members of the Church believe that the gospel of Christ has been known since the days of Adam. Critics claim that the New Testament teaches that the Gospel of Christ was a mystery unknown until the advent of Christ. (In defense of this claim, they often cite such scriptures as Rom. 16:25; 1 Cor. 2:7, 1 Cor. 4:1; Eph. 3:1-10; Col. 1:25-27). | |summary=Members of the Church believe that the gospel of Christ has been known since the days of Adam. Critics claim that the New Testament teaches that the Gospel of Christ was a mystery unknown until the advent of Christ. (In defense of this claim, they often cite such scriptures as Rom. 16:25; 1 Cor. 2:7, 1 Cor. 4:1; Eph. 3:1-10; Col. 1:25-27). | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Cosmology | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Cosmology |
|subject=Cosmology of the Bible | |subject=Cosmology of the Bible | ||
|summary=What do we know about how Bible authors viewed the earth and the universe? | |summary=What do we know about how Bible authors viewed the earth and the universe? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Condemnation of genealogy | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Condemnation of genealogy |
|subject=Genealogy, condemnation of | |subject=Genealogy, condemnation of | ||
|summary=Critics of Mormonism charge that the Bible condemns genealogy, and therefore the Latter-day Saint practice of compiling family histories is anti-Biblical, often citing 1 Timothy 1:4 or Titus 3:9. | |summary=Critics of Mormonism charge that the Bible condemns genealogy, and therefore the Latter-day Saint practice of compiling family histories is anti-Biblical, often citing 1 Timothy 1:4 or Titus 3:9. | ||
Line 100: | Line 100: | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/On-going divine revelation not necessary | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/On-going divine revelation not necessary |
|subject=On-going divine revelation not necessary | |subject=On-going divine revelation not necessary | ||
|summary=Critics of Mormonism claim that there is no need for on-going divine revelation today; some even charge that claims of visions from God or revelations to a modern prophet is a blasphemous idea. | |summary=Critics of Mormonism claim that there is no need for on-going divine revelation today; some even charge that claims of visions from God or revelations to a modern prophet is a blasphemous idea. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Three degrees of glory not biblical | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Three degrees of glory not biblical |
|subject=Three degrees of glory not biblical | |subject=Three degrees of glory not biblical | ||
|summary=Critics of Mormonism claim that the doctrine of three heavens has no basis in the Bible. | |summary=Critics of Mormonism claim that the doctrine of three heavens has no basis in the Bible. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Textual criticism | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Textual criticism |
|subject=Textual criticism | |subject=Textual criticism | ||
|summary= | |summary= | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Translations | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Translations |
|subject=Translations | |subject=Translations | ||
|summary=What are the merits of various biblical translations? | |summary=What are the merits of various biblical translations? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Transmission versus translation | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Transmission versus translation |
|subject=Transmission versus translation | |subject=Transmission versus translation | ||
|summary=LDS doctrine expresses belief in the Bible "as far as it is translated correctly." Does ''translated'' have a broader sense than the modern one? | |summary=LDS doctrine expresses belief in the Bible "as far as it is translated correctly." Does ''translated'' have a broader sense than the modern one? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Trustworthy | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Trustworthy |
|subject=Trustworthy? | |subject=Trustworthy? | ||
|summary=Do LDS regard the Bible as "untrustworthy"? | |summary=Do LDS regard the Bible as "untrustworthy"? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Old Testament practices | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Old Testament practices |
|subject=Old Testament practices | |subject=Old Testament practices | ||
|summary= | |summary= | ||
}}<noinclude> | }}<noinclude> | ||
{{SummaryItem2 | {{SummaryItem2 | ||
− | |link=Bible/Old Testament practices/Animal sacrifice | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Old Testament practices/Animal sacrifice |
|subject=Animal sacrifice | |subject=Animal sacrifice | ||
|summary=Critics claim that Joseph Smith favored "Old Testament practices" including "teaching animal sacrifice." | |summary=Critics claim that Joseph Smith favored "Old Testament practices" including "teaching animal sacrifice." | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem2 | {{SummaryItem2 | ||
− | |link=Bible/Old Testament practices/Cursing of enemies | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Old Testament practices/Cursing of enemies |
|subject=Cursing of enemies | |subject=Cursing of enemies | ||
|summary=Critics charge that Joseph Smith focused on Old Testament ideas and concepts, such as the "cursing of enemies." Critics appeal to New Testament prohibitions of cursing enemies (e.g., Rom. 12:14, and then argue that restoration scriptures or remarks by Church leaders are inconsistent with the Christian command to "bless, not curse." | |summary=Critics charge that Joseph Smith focused on Old Testament ideas and concepts, such as the "cursing of enemies." Critics appeal to New Testament prohibitions of cursing enemies (e.g., Rom. 12:14, and then argue that restoration scriptures or remarks by Church leaders are inconsistent with the Christian command to "bless, not curse." | ||
Line 147: | Line 147: | ||
==Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible== | ==Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible== | ||
{{SummaryItem | {{SummaryItem | ||
− | |link=Bible/Joseph Smith Translation | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Joseph Smith Translation |
|subject=Joseph Smith Translation | |subject=Joseph Smith Translation | ||
|summary=A collection of articles responding to criticisms related to the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible. | |summary=A collection of articles responding to criticisms related to the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible. | ||
}}<noinclude> | }}<noinclude> | ||
{{SummaryItem2 | {{SummaryItem2 | ||
− | |link=Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As a restoration of the original Bible text | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As a restoration of the original Bible text |
|subject=As a restoration of the original Bible text | |subject=As a restoration of the original Bible text | ||
|summary=If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these corrections not match known Biblical manuscripts? | |summary=If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these corrections not match known Biblical manuscripts? | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem2 | {{SummaryItem2 | ||
− | |link=Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible |
|subject=As the Church's official Bible | |subject=As the Church's official Bible | ||
|summary=Why don't Latter-day Saints use the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible as the "official" Bible instead of the King James Version. | |summary=Why don't Latter-day Saints use the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible as the "official" Bible instead of the King James Version. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem2 | {{SummaryItem2 | ||
− | |link=Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible/JST an embarrassment to leaders | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/As the Church's official Bible/JST an embarrassment to leaders |
|subject=JST an embarrassment to leaders? | |subject=JST an embarrassment to leaders? | ||
|summary=Critics claim that the Church is "embarrassed" by the Joseph Smith Translation. | |summary=Critics claim that the Church is "embarrassed" by the Joseph Smith Translation. | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{SummaryItem2 | {{SummaryItem2 | ||
− | |link=Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/Relationship to the Book of Mormon | + | |link=Mormonism and the Bible/Joseph Smith Translation/Relationship to the Book of Mormon |
|subject=Relationship of the JST to the Book of Mormon | |subject=Relationship of the JST to the Book of Mormon | ||
|summary=Some passages from the Bible (parts of Isaiah, for example) were included in the Book of Mormon text. However, the same passages were later revised for the Joseph Smith Translation of the Holy Bible. In some cases these passages are not rendered identically. Critics claim that if the JST was an accurate translation, it would match the supposedly more 'pure' Isaiah text possessed by the Nephites. | |summary=Some passages from the Bible (parts of Isaiah, for example) were included in the Book of Mormon text. However, the same passages were later revised for the Joseph Smith Translation of the Holy Bible. In some cases these passages are not rendered identically. Critics claim that if the JST was an accurate translation, it would match the supposedly more 'pure' Isaiah text possessed by the Nephites. |
Revision as of 09:11, 17 April 2011
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Answers portal |
Holy Bible |
RESOURCES |
---|
Book of Mormon & Bible: |
PERSPECTIVES |
MEDIA |
OTHER PORTALS |
Contents
- 1 The Bible as part of Latter-day Saint canon
- 1.1 Bible overview
- 1.2 Biblical accuracy
- 1.3 Biblical completeness
- 1.4 Biblical interpretation by Latter-day Saints and critics
- 1.4.1 Being "born again"—what does the Bible mean?
- 1.4.2 Christianity is a mystery
- 1.4.3 Cosmology of the Bible
- 1.4.4 Genealogy, condemnation of
- 1.4.5 "Eternal" commands in the Bible that were changed by later revelation.
- 1.4.6 Hebrews 7 and the Aaronic Priesthood
- 1.4.7 On-going divine revelation not necessary
- 1.4.8 Three degrees of glory not biblical
- 1.4.9 Textual criticism
- 1.4.10 Translations
- 1.4.11 Transmission versus translation
- 1.4.12 Trustworthy?
- 1.4.13 Old Testament practices
- 1.5 Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible
- 1.6 Relationship of the Bible to the Book of Mormon
- 1.7 Science and the Bible
The Bible as part of Latter-day Saint canon
Bible overview
Basics
Summary: Latter-day Saints consider the Bible to be holy scripture.Biblical accuracy
Inerrancy and the Bible
Summary: Critics claim the Bible texts, at least in their pristine form, were inerrant. Therefore, it is incorrect for Joseph Smith to teach that the Bible contains errors, mistakes, or omissions.Textual criticism
Summary: What can textual criticism tell us about the Bible? Does it have anything to say about the Bible being without error, as some Christians claim?Translations
Summary: The Church insists on using the Authorized ("King James") Version as its official Bible, even though more modern translations are easier to read, are more accurate, and include more recent manuscript discoveries. Critics sometimes complain that the eight Article of Faith about believing the Bible "as far as it is translated correctly," implies that Bible translators are trying to hide God's truth.Transmission versus translation
Summary: Critics try to show that by the term translation in the eighth Article of Faith, we really mean transmission.Trustworthy?
Summary: Critics claim that Latter-day Saint leaders diminish the Bible as untrustworthy.Biblical completeness
Completeness and sufficiency
Summary: Critics claim the Bible contains all necessary or essential knowledge to assure salvation. Therefore, things like modern prophets or additional scripture (such as the Book of Mormon) are unnecessary or even blasphemous."Adding to" or "taking away" from the Bible
Summary: Critics claim that the Book of Mormon cannot be true because nothing should be "added to" or "taken away from" the Holy Bible.Biblical inerrancy
Summary: Does the Bible teach that it is "inerrant"? Is this an idea with any meaning?Insufficient?
Summary: Critics interpret a statement by Orson Pratt to mean that Latter-day Saints believe that the Bible is "insufficient."Lost scripture
Open canon vs. closed canon
Biblical interpretation by Latter-day Saints and critics
Being "born again"—what does the Bible mean?
Summary: When the Bible talks about being "born again," what does this mean? How did the first Christians understand this concept?Christianity is a mystery
Summary: Members of the Church believe that the gospel of Christ has been known since the days of Adam. Critics claim that the New Testament teaches that the Gospel of Christ was a mystery unknown until the advent of Christ. (In defense of this claim, they often cite such scriptures as Rom. 16:25; 1 Cor. 2:7, 1 Cor. 4:1; Eph. 3:1-10; Col. 1:25-27).Cosmology of the Bible
Summary: What do we know about how Bible authors viewed the earth and the universe?Genealogy, condemnation of
Summary: Critics of Mormonism charge that the Bible condemns genealogy, and therefore the Latter-day Saint practice of compiling family histories is anti-Biblical, often citing 1 Timothy 1:4 or Titus 3:9."Eternal" commands in the Bible that were changed by later revelation.
Summary: Critics of Mormonism attack Joseph Smith for altering things that were "eternal," while ignoring other matters labeled "eternal" that were later changed by biblical prophets.Hebrews 7 and the Aaronic Priesthood
Summary: Hebrews 7 states that the Aaronic/Levitical Priesthood was "changed" to the unique priesthood "after the order of Melchizedek" held by Jesus Christ. Why then do Latter-day Saints still use the Aaronic Priesthood?On-going divine revelation not necessary
Summary: Critics of Mormonism claim that there is no need for on-going divine revelation today; some even charge that claims of visions from God or revelations to a modern prophet is a blasphemous idea.Three degrees of glory not biblical
Summary: Critics of Mormonism claim that the doctrine of three heavens has no basis in the Bible.Textual criticism
Translations
Summary: What are the merits of various biblical translations?Transmission versus translation
Summary: LDS doctrine expresses belief in the Bible "as far as it is translated correctly." Does translated have a broader sense than the modern one?Trustworthy?
Summary: Do LDS regard the Bible as "untrustworthy"?Old Testament practices
- Animal sacrifice—
Brief Summary: Critics claim that Joseph Smith favored "Old Testament practices" including "teaching animal sacrifice." (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗ - Cursing of enemies—
Brief Summary: Critics charge that Joseph Smith focused on Old Testament ideas and concepts, such as the "cursing of enemies." Critics appeal to New Testament prohibitions of cursing enemies (e.g., Rom. 12:14, and then argue that restoration scriptures or remarks by Church leaders are inconsistent with the Christian command to "bless, not curse." (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗
- Animal sacrifice—
Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible
Joseph Smith Translation
Summary: A collection of articles responding to criticisms related to the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible.- As a restoration of the original Bible text—
Brief Summary: If the Joseph Smith Translation (JST) is Joseph Smith's 'correction' of Biblical errors, why do these corrections not match known Biblical manuscripts? (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗ - As the Church's official Bible—
Brief Summary: Why don't Latter-day Saints use the Joseph Smith Translation of the Bible as the "official" Bible instead of the King James Version. (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗ - JST an embarrassment to leaders?—
Brief Summary: Critics claim that the Church is "embarrassed" by the Joseph Smith Translation. (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗ - Relationship of the JST to the Book of Mormon—
Brief Summary: Some passages from the Bible (parts of Isaiah, for example) were included in the Book of Mormon text. However, the same passages were later revised for the Joseph Smith Translation of the Holy Bible. In some cases these passages are not rendered identically. Critics claim that if the JST was an accurate translation, it would match the supposedly more 'pure' Isaiah text possessed by the Nephites. (Click here for full article)∗ ∗ ∗
- As a restoration of the original Bible text—