Revision as of 20:22, 25 February 2011 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (rm) ← Older edit		Revision as of 18:30, 25 March 2012 (view source) RogerNicholson (talk | contribs) (mv) Newer edit →
Line 10:		Line 10:
	</onlyinclude>		</onlyinclude>
−	=={{Further reading label}}==	+	{{FurtherReading}}
−
−	==={{FAIR web site label}}===
−	{{AtheismFAIR}}
−
−	==={{External links label}}===
−	{{AtheismLinks}}
−
−	==={{Printed material label}}===
−	{{AtheismPrint}}
	{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}		{{Articles Footer 1}} {{Articles Footer 2}} {{Articles Footer 3}} {{Articles Footer 4}} {{Articles Footer 5}} {{Articles Footer 6}} {{Articles Footer 7}} {{Articles Footer 8}} {{Articles Footer 9}} {{Articles Footer 10}}
	[[fr:Atheism]]		[[fr:Atheism]]

---

Revision as of 18:30, 25 March 2012

1. REDIRECTTemplate:Test3

Mormon responses to atheism

Subjective revelation

Summary: Critics complain that the LDS appeal to "revelation" or a "burning in the bosom" is subjective, emotion-based, and thus unreliable and susceptible to self-deception. Sectarian critics also belittle appeals to spiritual experiences, comparing them to "warm fuzzies," or merely something "felt by simply watching a Hollywood movie."

Further reading and additional sources responding to these claims