Difference between revisions of "Template:Critical sources box:Book of Mormon/Authorship theories/Spalding manuscript/CriticalSources"

m
m
Line 1: Line 1:
 
===Source(s) of the Criticism===
 
===Source(s) of the Criticism===
  
''Sources which accept the Spaulding manuscript theory:''
+
''Sources which accept the Spalding manuscript theory:''
 
* “The Mormon Mystery Developed,” ''Wayne Sentinel'' (Palmyra, New York) (20 December 1833). {{link|url=http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/BOMP&CISOPTR=674&REC=2}} [earliest mention of the theory identified by FAIR]
 
* “The Mormon Mystery Developed,” ''Wayne Sentinel'' (Palmyra, New York) (20 December 1833). {{link|url=http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cdm4/document.php?CISOROOT=/BOMP&CISOPTR=674&REC=2}} [earliest mention of the theory identified by FAIR]
 
* {{CriticalWork:Caswall:Prophet of the Nineteenth Century|pages=13–25}}  
 
* {{CriticalWork:Caswall:Prophet of the Nineteenth Century|pages=13–25}}  
Line 10: Line 10:
 
*{{CriticalWork:Wyl:Mormon Portraits Volume First|pages=20, 118, 122–124, 238–243}}
 
*{{CriticalWork:Wyl:Mormon Portraits Volume First|pages=20, 118, 122–124, 238–243}}
 
*{{CriticalWork:Tucker:Origin Rise and Progress|pages=111–128}}
 
*{{CriticalWork:Tucker:Origin Rise and Progress|pages=111–128}}
''Claimed the existence of a '''second''' Spaulding manuscript when the first theory failed:''
+
''Claimed the existence of a '''second''' Spalding manuscript when the first theory failed:''
 
*George B. Arbaugh, ''Revelation in Mormonism'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1932).
 
*George B. Arbaugh, ''Revelation in Mormonism'' (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1932).
 
*{{CriticalWork:Cowdery:Who Really Wrote 1|pages=1–}}
 
*{{CriticalWork:Cowdery:Who Really Wrote 1|pages=1–}}
 
*{{CriticalWork:Cowdery:Who Really Wrote 2|pages=1–}}
 
*{{CriticalWork:Cowdery:Who Really Wrote 2|pages=1–}}
 
*{{CriticalWork:Martin:Kingdom of the Cults|pages=213, n15-16}}
 
*{{CriticalWork:Martin:Kingdom of the Cults|pages=213, n15-16}}

Revision as of 20:49, 30 March 2010

Source(s) of the Criticism

Sources which accept the Spalding manuscript theory:

  • “The Mormon Mystery Developed,” Wayne Sentinel (Palmyra, New York) (20 December 1833). off-site [earliest mention of the theory identified by FAIR]
  • Henry Caswall, The Prophet of the Nineteenth Century, or, the Rise, Progress, and Present State of the Mormons, or Latter-Day Saints : To Which Is Appended an Analysis of the Book of Mormon (London: Printed for J. G. F. & J. Rivington, 1843), 13–25. off-site
  • Rev. John A. Clark, Gleanings by the Way, (Philadelphia: W.J. and J.K. Simon; New York: Robert Carter, 1842), 246–254 off-site.
  • Eber D. Howe, Mormonism Unvailed (Painesville, OH, 1834). (Affidavits examined)
  • William Alexander Linn, The Story of the Mormons (New York: Macmillan, 1902), ??.
  • Stenhouse, "Tell It All", 267.
  • Wilhelm Wyl, Mormon Portraits Volume First: Joseph Smith the Prophet, His Family and Friends (Salt Lake City: Tribune Printing and Publishing Co., 1886), 20, 118, 122–124, 238–243.
  • Pomeroy Tucker, Origin, Rise, and Progress: of Mormonism.... (New York: D. Appleton, 1867), 111–128.

Claimed the existence of a second Spalding manuscript when the first theory failed:

  • George B. Arbaugh, Revelation in Mormonism (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1932).
  • Howard A. Davis, Wayne L. Cowdrey, and Walter Martin, Who Really Wrote the Book of Mormon? (Santa Ana, Ca.: Vision House Publishers, 1977), 1–. Analysis
  • Wayne L. Cowdrey, Howard A. Davis, and Arthur Vanick, Who Really Wrote the Book of Mormon? The Spalding Enigma. (St. Louis: Concordia, 2005), 1–. Analysis
  • Walter Martin, The Kingdom of the Cults (Revised) (Minneapolis: Bethany House Publishers, 1997), 213, n15-16. ( Index of claims )