FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Mormonism and the nature of God/"God is a man""
m (→Response) |
m (robot Adding: fr:Nature of God/"God is a man") |
||
Line 42: | Line 42: | ||
===Printed material=== | ===Printed material=== | ||
{{GodPrint}} | {{GodPrint}} | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[fr:Nature of God/"God is a man"]] |
Revision as of 17:37, 2 May 2010
Answers portal |
God |
RESOURCES |
---|
|
PERSPECTIVES |
MEDIA |
OTHER PORTALS |
Contents
Criticism
Critics object to the LDS position that God has a physical body and human form by quoting scripture which says that "God is not a man" (e.g. Numbers 23꞉19, 1 Samuel 15꞉29, Hosea 11꞉9).
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, click here
Response
These scriptures read (emphasis added):
- "God is not a man, that he should lie; neither the son of man [i.e., a human being], that he should repent: hath he said, and shall he not do it? or hath he spoken, and shall he not make it good?" - Numbers 23꞉19
- "And also the Strength of Israel will not lie nor repent: for he is not a man, that he should repent." - 1 Samuel 15꞉29
- I will not execute the fierceness of mine anger, I will not return to destroy Ephraim: for I am God, and not man; the Holy One in the midst of thee: and I will not enter into the city. - Hosea 11꞉9
The first passage, in Numbers, not only says that "God is not a man", but it also says that God is not "the son of man." If a Christian were to claim from this passage that God is not a man, they would have to consistently claim that God is also not a "son of man." This of course contradicts many New Testament statements about Jesus (who is God) to the contrary. Though there are many examples, one should suffice. Jesus says, "For as Jonas was three days and three nights in the whale’s belly; so shall the Son of man be three days and three nights in the heart of the earth." Matthew 12꞉40 Therefore, we know that the passage from Numbers is not suggesting that God is fundamentally not a "son of man", but rather that God is not a "son of man" in the sense that God doesn't have need for repentance. The next logical step requires us to conclude that the passage is not suggesting that God is fundamentally "not a man", but that God is not a man in the sense that God does not lie.
These verses say nothing about the nature or form of God—they merely assert that God is not like man in certain ways. God will not lie or change his declared course, unlike humans. As the NET translation of 1 Samuel says, "The Preeminent One of Israel does not go back on his word or change his mind, for he is not a human being who changes his mind.”
Conclusion
Surely the critics do not mean to imply that God cannot be in human form—the fundamental doctrine of Christianity is that Jesus is God, made flesh. The critics' reading would require these verses to also apply to Jesus, when they clearly do not. Jesus may be in human form, but he will not sin, change his mind from doing his father's will.
Endnotes
None