FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Multiple accounts of the First Vision"
(→Response: quote) |
m (robot Adding: fr:First Vision/Accounts) |
||
| Line 85: | Line 85: | ||
[[de:Berichte_%C3%BCber_die_Erste_Vision]] | [[de:Berichte_%C3%BCber_die_Erste_Vision]] | ||
[[Category:First Vision]] | [[Category:First Vision]] | ||
| + | |||
| + | [[fr:First Vision/Accounts]] | ||
Revision as of 21:31, 1 May 2010
Criticism
Joseph Smith gave several accounts of the First Vision. Critics charge that differences in the accounts show that he changed and embellished his story over time, and that he therefore had no such vision.
To see citations to the critical sources for these claims, [[../CriticalSources|click here]]
Response
Joseph's vision was at first an intensely personal experience—an answer to a specific question. Over time, however, illuminated by additional experience and instruction, it became the founding revelation of the Restoration.—Elder Dennis B. Neuenschwander (of the Seventy), Ensign, January 2009, p. 28.
I am not worried that the Prophet Joseph Smith gave a number of versions of the first vision anymore than I am worried that there are four different writers of the gospels in the New Testament, each with his own perceptions, each telling the events to meet his own purpose for writing at the time. I am more concerned with the fact that God has revealed in this dispensation a great and marvelous and beautiful plan that motivates men and women to love their Creator and their Redeemer, to appreciate and serve one another, to walk in faith on the road that leads to immortality and eternal life.
—Gordon B. Hinckley, Ensign, October 1984
Critics of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints often seek to point out differences between the various accounts which Joseph Smith gave of his First Vision. In defense of their position that the Prophet changed his story over a six year period (1832 to 1838) they claim that the earliest followers of Joseph Smith either didn’t know about the First Vision, or seem to have been confused about it.
Criticisms of the accounts in general
- Critics charge that the existence of multiple accounts of the First Vision have been suppressed or hidden.
Criticisms of Joseph's 1832 account of the First Vision
- Did Joseph Smith claim to see only one Personage in his 1832 vision account?
- Did Joseph give a different age in the 1832 account?
- Did Joseph's 1832 account not mention any religious revivals in his area?
- Was Joseph's motivation in the 1832 account different than later accounts?
- Was the idea of a new dispensation a later addition to Joseph's account?
- Did Joseph really not mention being forbidden to join other churches in 1832?
- Was persecution for his vision absent in Joseph's 1832 account?
- Why isn't the Prophet's struggle with Satan in the 1832 account?
- Why does the 1832 account mention destruction of the wicked but the 1838 account doesn't?
- Is the 1832 vision set in heaven or on the earth?
- Does the 1832 account say that eternal life is given to everyone regardless of church affiliation?
Criticisms of Joseph's 1835 account of the First Vision
Criticisms of Joseph's 1838 account of the First Vision
- [[../Smith family place of residence in 1820|Where was the Smith family living in the second year after their "removal to Manchester?"]]
- [[../Methodist camp meetings|Joseph said that the religious excitement "commenced with the Methodists"]]
- [[../Lucy Mack Smith and the Presbyterians|When was Joseph's family "proselyted to the Presbyterian faith?"]]
- Did Joseph create the 1838 account to offset a leadership crisis?
Criticism of other individuals' accounts of the First Vision
- Did George Q. Cannon claim Joseph only had the ministering of angels?
- Was Oliver Cowdery unaware of the First Vision as late as 1834–1835?
- Did Orson Hyde really claim Joseph only had the ministering of angels?
- Did Andrew Jenson call Joseph's heavenly visitor "an angel," rather than God?
- Did Heber C. Kimball really deny that the Father appeared to Joseph?
- Was Orson Pratt confused about who appeared at the First vision?
- Did Parley P. Pratt only mention the appearance of God?
- Was George A. Smith unaware of the visit of the Father and the Son?
- Did Lucy Mack Smith, Joseph's mother, refer to "an angel," rather than God?
- Where did William Smith get the idea that an "angel" appeared?
- Did Orson Spencer say that the Prophet's first manifestation was of an "angel"?
- Did John Taylor teach that Joseph Smith saw only one Deity?
- Did Wilford Woodruff speak of an "angel" appearing during the First Vision?
- Did Brigham Young really never mention the First Vision in his lifetime of preaching?
- Did Brigham Young claim only an angel appeared?
Conclusion
Joseph Smith's various accounts of the First Vision were targeted at different audiences, and had different purposes. They, however, show a remarkable degree of harmony between them. There is no evidence that the early leaders of the LDS Church did not understand that the Prophet saw two Divine Personages during his inaugural theophany.