FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Biblical/Quoting Malachi"
< Book of Mormon | Anachronisms | Biblical
m |
m (→Response) |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
==Response== | ==Response== | ||
| − | * {{Main|Book_of_Mormon_plagiarized_from_the_Bible|Book of Mormon plagiarized from the Bible?}} | + | * {{Main|Book_of_Mormon_plagiarized_from_the_Bible|l1=Book of Mormon plagiarized from the Bible?}} |
The Book of Mormon claims to be a "translation." Therefore, the language used is that of Joseph Smith. Joseph could choose to render similar (or identical) material using King James Bible language if that adequately represented the text's intent. | The Book of Mormon claims to be a "translation." Therefore, the language used is that of Joseph Smith. Joseph could choose to render similar (or identical) material using King James Bible language if that adequately represented the text's intent. | ||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
The translation ''language'' may resemble Malachi, but the work is not attributed to Malachi. Only if we presume that the Book of Mormon is a fraud at the outset is this proof of anything. If we assume that it is a translation, then the use of Bible language tells us merely that Joseph used biblical language. | The translation ''language'' may resemble Malachi, but the work is not attributed to Malachi. Only if we presume that the Book of Mormon is a fraud at the outset is this proof of anything. If we assume that it is a translation, then the use of Bible language tells us merely that Joseph used biblical language. | ||
| − | Joseph used entire chapters (e.g., {{s|3|Nephi|12-14|}} based on biblical texts that he did not claim were quotations. If these are not a problem, then a resemblance to biblical language elsewhere is not either, since that is simply how Joseph translated. | + | Joseph used entire chapters (e.g., {{s|3|Nephi|12-14|}} based on biblical texts that he did not claim were quotations from original texts (even Malachi is treated this way by Jesus in {{s|3|Nephi|24-25|}}. If these are not a problem, then a resemblance to biblical language elsewhere is not either, since that is simply how Joseph translated. |
If Joseph ''was'' a fraud, why would he plagiarize the one text—the King James Bible—which his readers would be sure to know, and sure to react negatively if they noticed it? The Book of Mormon contains much original material—Joseph didn't "need" to use the KJV; he is obviously capable of producing original material. | If Joseph ''was'' a fraud, why would he plagiarize the one text—the King James Bible—which his readers would be sure to know, and sure to react negatively if they noticed it? The Book of Mormon contains much original material—Joseph didn't "need" to use the KJV; he is obviously capable of producing original material. | ||
Revision as of 15:11, 23 June 2009
This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.
Contents
Criticism
- Critics claim that the Book of Mormon cannot be an ancient work because it quotes Malachi hundreds of years before Malachi was written (i.e, they claim that Malachi 4:1 is quoted in 1 Nephi 22꞉15).
Source(s) of the criticism
- Jerald and Sandra Tanner, The Changing World of Mormonism (Moody Press, 1979), 115.( Index of claims )
Response
The Book of Mormon claims to be a "translation." Therefore, the language used is that of Joseph Smith. Joseph could choose to render similar (or identical) material using King James Bible language if that adequately represented the text's intent.
The translation language may resemble Malachi, but the work is not attributed to Malachi. Only if we presume that the Book of Mormon is a fraud at the outset is this proof of anything. If we assume that it is a translation, then the use of Bible language tells us merely that Joseph used biblical language.
Joseph used entire chapters (e.g., 3 Nephi 12-14 based on biblical texts that he did not claim were quotations from original texts (even Malachi is treated this way by Jesus in 3 Nephi 24-25. If these are not a problem, then a resemblance to biblical language elsewhere is not either, since that is simply how Joseph translated.
If Joseph was a fraud, why would he plagiarize the one text—the King James Bible—which his readers would be sure to know, and sure to react negatively if they noticed it? The Book of Mormon contains much original material—Joseph didn't "need" to use the KJV; he is obviously capable of producing original material.
Endnotes
None
Further reading
Book of Mormon/Anachronisms/Biblical/Quoting Malachi
FAIR wiki articles
FAIR web site
- FAIR Topical Guide: