375 epigraph (PB)

• Gordon B. Hinckley is listed as "President, Mormon Church"

• There is no church called the "Mormon Church."
• Perhaps in this epigraph to a chapter entitled "Is Mormonism Christian?", the author wished to avoid stating the true name of the Church: The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints?

• N/A

375, n3 (PB)

• The author presents his second significant reason that people join the Church as "the long-held Mormon notion that Latter-day Saints are innately better than non-Mormons."

•  The author's claim is false
• This claim actually originated with the Tanners. The author also quotes the Tanner's primary source. See: Jerald and Sandra Tanner, The Changing World of Mormonism (Moody Press, 1979), 27.( Index of claims ).
• Unsurprisingly, there is no mention of gaining a testimony of the Book of Mormon mentioned among the many reasons the author presents for joining the Church—the reason most Latter-day Saints themselves would give.
• Attitude to non-members

• Joseph Fielding Smith, Doctrines of Salvation, vol. 1, 236.

376 (PB)

• Does the Church have, as the book claims, a "standard practice" of "not disclosing controversial doctrines?"

• Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Loaded and prejudicial language

• No source provided.

376 (PB)

• Did early LDS leaders take a "staunchly anti-Christian stance?"

• Did early LDS leaders denounce Christianity?

• No source provided.

377, n8(PB)

• Did Joseph actually say that all the churches of Christendom "were all wrong" and that Christian ministers "were all corrupt?"

• This claim is also made in Becoming Gods, [[Becoming Gods/Index#{{{pages}}}|p. {{{pages}}}]]
• Individual versus organizational apostasy
• All churches were wrong

• Pearl of Great Price, Joseph Smith History 1:19

377 (PB)

• Did Joseph claim that all other churches were founded by Satan and part of the "satanic world system?"

• Great and abominable church
• Loaded and prejudicial language

• 1 Nephi 13꞉6

377, 600n11-14 (PB)

• Did LDS leaders spend 150 years calling Christians "derogatory names" and insulting them?

• Did early LDS leaders denounce Christianity?

• Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses, vol. 10, 265.
• Heber C. Kimball, Journal of Discourses 5:89.
• Orson Pratt, The Kingdom of God—Part 1, no. 2, October 31, 1848, 3. Reprinted in Orson Pratt, Orson Pratt's Works, vol. 2
• Kent P. Jackson, "Early Signs of the Apostasy," Ensign, December 1984, 9.

378, 601n18-21 (PB)

• The book presents a table contrasting "Mormon Beliefs About Jesus" with "Christian Beliefs About Jesus."

• One Nation Under Gods—"Mormon Beliefs About Jesus" versus "Christian Beliefs About Jesus"

• Joseph Fielding Smith, vol. 1, 130 and Ezra Taft Benson, Teaching of Ezra Taft Benson, 14. Quoted in "Gethsemane Was Site of "Greatest Single Act," Church News, June 1, 1991, 14.
• Joseph Fielding Smith, vol. 1, 188.
• 1 Peter 2꞉24, Colossians 1꞉20, Romans 5꞉8-9, 2 Corinthians 5꞉17-20, Hebrews 10꞉12

379 601n22(PB)

• Did President Hinckley actually "confess" that Latter-day Saint do not believe in the same 'Jesus' in which non-LDS Christians believe?

• This was no "confession"—President Hinckley was bearing testimony of Christ.
  • President Hinckley believes in the biblical Christ
  • President Hinckley insists he is a Christian
  • Author's distorted "Mormon" Jesus vs. "Traditional" Jesus
• Latter-day_Saints_aren't_Christians

• Gordon B. Hinckley. Quoted in "Crown of Gospel is Upon Our Heads," LDS Church News, June 20, 1998, 7.

379-380 601n23 (PB)

• Did Bruce R. McConkie discourage people from attempting to form a "personal relationship" with Christ?
• McConkie said:

"[Y]ou have never heard one of the First Presidency or the Twelve...advocate this excessive zeal that calls for gaining a so-called special and personal relationship with Christ..."

•  Misrepresentation of source: Use of sources: McConkie on special relationship ^[ATTENTION!]

• Bruce R. McConkie, "Our Relationship with the Lord," BYU Speech, March 2 1982.

380

• Is the "LDS teaching" that there exists more than one god is refuted by the Bible?

• Polytheism
• Isaiah 43-46 have been misinterpreted by the author in this context.

• Isaiah 43꞉10
• Isaiah 44꞉8

380

• If the Bible says that "God will share His glory with no one," then how could one hope to become like Him?

• These verses say God will not give his glory to another. That is, God will not cease to be God or decline in glory. But, the scriptures are clear that God will share his glory with others: "To him that overcometh will I grant to sit with me in my throne, even as I also overcame, and am set down with my Father in his throne" (Revelation 3:21).
• Deification of man

• Isaiah 42꞉8
• Isaiah 48꞉10-11

380, 603n25 (HB) 601n25 (PB)

• Paul said in the Bible that "the natural (or physical) comes first, then comes the spiritual." Why then, did Brigham Young say that people are "made first spiritual, and afterwards temporal?"

• The verse in Paul is speaking of the resurrection, not pre-mortal life. See: Use of sources: Natural before spiritual body?
• Premortal existence

• Brigham Young, Journal of Discourses 1:50..
• Zechariah 12꞉1

381, 603n26 (HB) 601n26 (PB)

• The author states: "The Christian gospel is the death, burial, and resurrection of Jesus (1 Cor. 15:1-4)."
• The Latter-day Saint gospel, by contrast is represented by a statement by George Q. Cannon, who said to have claimed that LDS believe that "evolution of man until he shall become a god" is "the Gospel of Jesus Christ, believed in by the Latter-day Saints."

• It is absurd to imply that the death, burial and resurrection of Jesus Christ is not central to Latter-day Saint belief.
• Absurd claims
• Deification of man

• George Q. Cannon, Gospel Truth, vol. 1, 9.

383, 601n29

• Do LDS dismiss the Bible's teachings "whenever they contradict official LDS beliefs?"

•  Misrepresentation of source: Elder McConkie wrote simply that "The Church uses the King James Version of the Bible, but acceptance of the Bible is coupled with a reservation that it is true only insofar as translated correctly." Thus, the Bible is scripture, but if the translation or transmission of the text has been corrupted, why ought one to accept it?
• Latter-day Saints may have a different interpretation of the Bible than the author, or his brand of Christianity. What makes his interpretation valid and another invalid? No two Christian denominations believe in all the same biblical readings.
• Biblical inerrancy
• Textual criticism
• Bible complete and sufficient?/Sola scriptura

• Bruce R. McConkie, Mormon Doctrine, 764.

383-4, 601n31

• Did LDS leaders repeatedly condemn the Bible?

• Leaders did not "condemn the Bible," but (as the title of Elder Pratt's work shows) argued that the divided state of Christendom was ample testimony that the Bible alone did not seem sufficient to settle all doctrinal arguments and difficulties. It is difficult to question this, with various Christian sects which continue to proliferate.
• Use of sources: Orson Pratt condemns the Bible?
• Bible complete and sufficient? / Sola scriptura

• Orson Pratt, "The Bible and Tradition, without Further Revelation, an Insufficient Guide," Divine Authenticity fo the Book of Mormon—No. 3," December 1, 1850, 47. Reprinted in Orson Pratt, Orson Pratt's Works, vol. 2.

385

• Did the Church present itself as a "Christian organization" only by restricing accurate information about LDS beliefs?

• The irony is thick when this book complains about the "dissemination of incomplete and deceptive information."
• LDS only recently claim to be Christian?
• Loaded and prejudicial language

• Author's opinion

385, 601n37-38

• Was a "faithful Mormon" excommunicated for "accurately" explaining "Mormon doctrines and history?"
• Did the Church respond that such information had to be suppressed so that the Church could become more "mainstream" Christian?

• This claim is absurd—The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints is not "trying to become a mainstream Christian church."
• LDS only recently claim to be Christian?
• Absurd claims
• Loaded and prejudicial language

• T. LaMar Sleight, letter to Michael Barrett. Quoted in Bill McKeever, "Excommunicated for Publicly Discussing Mormon Doctrine?", Mormonism Researched (Summer 1994), 3.

388

• Did Gordon B. Hinckely answer questions about LDS doctrine evasively?

• Downplaying LDS doctrine?
• Loaded and prejudicial language

• No source provided.

389, 603n45 (HB)

• Gordon B. Hinckley said: "None of you need worry because you read something that was incompletely reported. You need not worry that I do not understand some matters of doctrine. I think I understand them thoroughly."

• Downplaying LDS doctrine?
• Use of sources: Gordon B. Hinckley Understands Doctrine

• Gordon B. Hinckley, October 1997 General Conference Address.

389

•  Author's quote: "The masking of Mormonism has continued unabated...Mormonism's smoke-screen of words has served to greatly confuse observers..."

• Loaded and prejudicial language

391, n53

• Have Latter-day Saints attempted to "infiltrate" Christian churches in order to convert entire congregations?

• How, exactly, do members of the Church 'infiltrate' other denominations? When their deception became known, would the pastor not turn away? How do the members of the Church manage to brainwash these pastors into accepting their theology anyway?
• LDS only recently claim to be Christian?
• Criticism of Mormonism/Books/Absurd claims

• Rick Branch, "Mormon Church Infiltrates Christianity," Watchman Expositor, vol. 9, no. 3, 7.

393-400

• Is the LDS Church really a "cult?"

• LDS Church is a cult

• Various

400

• The author states that LDS leaders will have to "completely sever its ties with Christianity" in order not to be called a "cult" and gain "legitimacy."

• The idea that Latter-day Saints will ever disassociate themselves from Christ is an extremely absurd claim.
• LDS only recently claim to be Christian?
• Absurd claims

• Author's opinion.