Difference between revisions of "Criticism of Mormonism/Books/One Nation Under Gods/Presentism"

(header)
 
(Presentism: quote)
Line 8: Line 8:
 
|notes={{AuthorsDisclaimer}}
 
|notes={{AuthorsDisclaimer}}
 
}}
 
}}
=Presentism=
+
=Presentism=  
“Presentism” is an analytical fallacy in which past behavior is evaluated by modern standards or mores. 
+
<blockquote>
 
+
''Presentism, at its worst, encourages a kind of moral complacency and self-congratulation. Interpreting the past in terms of present concerns usually leads us to find ourselves morally superior. . . . Our forbears constantly fail to measure up to our present-day standards.''
“Presentism,” observed American Historical Association president Lynn Hunt, “at its worst, encourages a kind of moral complacency and self-congratulation. Interpreting the past in terms of present concerns usually leads us to find ourselves morally superior. . . . Our forbears constantly fail to measure up to our present-day standards.”{{ref|hunt1}}
+
<br>
 
+
&mdash;Lynn Hunt, “Against Presentism,Perspectives 40/5 (May 2002) {{link|url=http://www.historians.org/perspectives/issues/2002/0205/}}
The following are some of our favorite examples:
+
</blockquote>
 +
“Presentism” is an analytical fallacy in which past behavior is evaluated by modern standards or mores. The following are some of our favorite examples:

Revision as of 13:49, 28 December 2008


A work by author: Richard Abanes

Presentism

Presentism, at its worst, encourages a kind of moral complacency and self-congratulation. Interpreting the past in terms of present concerns usually leads us to find ourselves morally superior. . . . Our forbears constantly fail to measure up to our present-day standards.
—Lynn Hunt, “Against Presentism,” Perspectives 40/5 (May 2002) off-site

“Presentism” is an analytical fallacy in which past behavior is evaluated by modern standards or mores. The following are some of our favorite examples: