Difference between revisions of "Doctrine and Covenants/Textual changes"

(Criticism, potential responses, links)
m (Change Petersen link to title page)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
*Melvin J. Petersen, [http://library.lds.org/library/lpext.dll/ArchMagazines/Ensign/1985.htm/ensign%20february%201985.htm/preparing%20early%20revelations%20for%20publication.htm?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0 "Preparing Early Revelations for Publication"], ''Ensign'', February 1985, p. 14.
 
*Melvin J. Petersen, [http://library.lds.org/library/lpext.dll/ArchMagazines/Ensign/1985.htm/ensign%20february%201985.htm/preparing%20early%20revelations%20for%20publication.htm?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0 "Preparing Early Revelations for Publication"], ''Ensign'', February 1985, p. 14.
 
*Robert J. Woodford, [http://library.lds.org/library/lpext.dll/ArchMagazines/Ensign/1985.htm/ensign%20january%201985%20.htm/how%20the%20revelations%20in%20the%20doctrine%20and%20covenants%20were%20received%20and%20compiled.htm?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0 "How the Revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants Were Received and Compiled"], ''Ensign'', January 1985, p. 27.
 
*Robert J. Woodford, [http://library.lds.org/library/lpext.dll/ArchMagazines/Ensign/1985.htm/ensign%20january%201985%20.htm/how%20the%20revelations%20in%20the%20doctrine%20and%20covenants%20were%20received%20and%20compiled.htm?fn=document-frame.htm&f=templates&2.0 "How the Revelations in the Doctrine and Covenants Were Received and Compiled"], ''Ensign'', January 1985, p. 27.
*Melvin J. Petersen, [http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cgi-bin/docviewer.exe?CISOROOT=/MormonThesesP-Q&CISOPTR=6226 ''A Study of the Nature of and the Significance of the Changes in the Revelations as Found in a Comparison of the Book of Commandments and Subsequent Editions of the Doctrine and Covenants''], master's thesis, Brigham Young University, 1955.
+
*Melvin J. Petersen, [http://contentdm.lib.byu.edu/cgi-bin/docviewer.exe?CISOROOT=/MormonThesesP-Q&CISOPTR=6226&CISOSHOW=3290 ''A Study of the Nature of and the Significance of the Changes in the Revelations as Found in a Comparison of the Book of Commandments and Subsequent Editions of the Doctrine and Covenants''], master's thesis, Brigham Young University, 1955.
  
 
===Printed material===  
 
===Printed material===  
 
*Robert J. Woodford, ''The Historical Development of the Doctrine and Covenants'', Ph.D. dissertation (3 volumes), Brigham Young University, 1974. (Available from [http://wwwlib.umi.com/dxweb/gateway UMI Dissertation Express]; order number 8027231.)
 
*Robert J. Woodford, ''The Historical Development of the Doctrine and Covenants'', Ph.D. dissertation (3 volumes), Brigham Young University, 1974. (Available from [http://wwwlib.umi.com/dxweb/gateway UMI Dissertation Express]; order number 8027231.)

Revision as of 16:00, 6 February 2006

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

Criticism

Joseph Smith made revisions, additions, and deletions to his early revelations when preparing them for publication. Critics claim that revelations from God should never be changed, and this proves that Joseph Smith did not receive revelation.

Source(s) of the Criticism

  • Tanners

Response

Responses include:

  • An exploration of the revelation process as understood by Latter-day Saints.
  • Examples from the Bible where revelations were changed.
  • Analysis of some of the changes.

Conclusion

The words were Joseph's, and he could change them as he received additional insight.

Further reading

FAIR web site

External links

Printed material

  • Robert J. Woodford, The Historical Development of the Doctrine and Covenants, Ph.D. dissertation (3 volumes), Brigham Young University, 1974. (Available from UMI Dissertation Express; order number 8027231.)