Difference between revisions of "The Bible/Translations"

m (External links: Summer89 -> Summer 1989)
(Response: Tagged)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
However, there is nothing in Church policy or official Church teaching that forbids Latter-day Saints from reading other Bible translations in their personal study.
 
However, there is nothing in Church policy or official Church teaching that forbids Latter-day Saints from reading other Bible translations in their personal study.
 +
 +
{{nw}}
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
==Conclusion==
 
==Conclusion==

Revision as of 07:24, 25 August 2008

Answers portal
Holy Bible
BibleMiniature1.jpg
Resources.icon.tiny.1.png    RESOURCES




Book of Mormon & Bible:

Perspectives.icon.tiny.1.png    PERSPECTIVES
Media.icon.tiny.1.png    MEDIA
Resources.icon.tiny.1.png    OTHER PORTALS

This article is a draft. FairMormon editors are currently editing it. We welcome your suggestions on improving the content.

Criticism

The Church insists on using the Authorized ("King James") Version as its official Bible, even though more modern translations are easier to read, are more accurate, and include more recent manuscript discoveries.

Source(s) of the criticism

Response

The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints uses the Authorized (King James) Version as its official Bible.

However, there is nothing in Church policy or official Church teaching that forbids Latter-day Saints from reading other Bible translations in their personal study.

 [needs work]

Further reading

FAIR wiki articles

Template:Biblewiki

FAIR web site

  • Links to articles on the FAIR web site; Topical Guide entries go first

External links

  • Philip L. Barlow, "Why the King James Version? From the Common to the Official Bible of Mormonism," Dialogue: A Journal of Mormon Thought 22 no. 2 (Summer 1989), 19–42. off-site

Printed material

  • Printed resources whose text is not available online