FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
Difference between revisions of "Is polygamy sexist?"
SpencerMarsh (talk | contribs) (Created page with "{{FairMormon}} ==Question: Is polygamy sexist?== {{UnderConstructionSuggestions}} ===Introduction to Question=== Many assert that Latter-day Saint polygamy is sexist. This per...") |
SpencerMarsh (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{FairMormon}} | {{FairMormon}} | ||
| + | <onlyinclude> | ||
==Question: Is polygamy sexist?== | ==Question: Is polygamy sexist?== | ||
{{UnderConstructionSuggestions}} | {{UnderConstructionSuggestions}} | ||
| Line 6: | Line 7: | ||
It is claimed that the historical practice of polygamy by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as well as some of the theology about celestial polygamy is sexist. This has been most passionately argued by Latter-day Saint poet Carol Lynn Pearson in her book ''The Ghost of Eternal Polygamy: Haunting the Hearts and Heaven of Mormon Women and Men''.<ref>Carol Lynn Pearson, ''The Ghost of Eternal Polygamy: Haunting the Hearts and Heaven of Mormon Women and Men'' (Walnut Creek, CA: Pivot Point Books, 2016). For reviews that expose the weaknesses of Pearson’s position and approach, see Allen Wyatt, “[https://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/scary-ghost-stories-in-the-light-of-day/ Scary Ghost Stories in the Light of Day],” ''Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship'' 23 (2017): 137-160; Brian C. Hales, “[https://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/opportunity-lost/ Opportunity Lost],” ''Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship'' 23 (2017): 91-109.</ref> | It is claimed that the historical practice of polygamy by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as well as some of the theology about celestial polygamy is sexist. This has been most passionately argued by Latter-day Saint poet Carol Lynn Pearson in her book ''The Ghost of Eternal Polygamy: Haunting the Hearts and Heaven of Mormon Women and Men''.<ref>Carol Lynn Pearson, ''The Ghost of Eternal Polygamy: Haunting the Hearts and Heaven of Mormon Women and Men'' (Walnut Creek, CA: Pivot Point Books, 2016). For reviews that expose the weaknesses of Pearson’s position and approach, see Allen Wyatt, “[https://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/scary-ghost-stories-in-the-light-of-day/ Scary Ghost Stories in the Light of Day],” ''Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship'' 23 (2017): 137-160; Brian C. Hales, “[https://journal.interpreterfoundation.org/opportunity-lost/ Opportunity Lost],” ''Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship'' 23 (2017): 91-109.</ref> | ||
| + | </onlyinclude> | ||
| + | {{endnotes sources}} | ||
Revision as of 14:55, 21 February 2022
- REDIRECTTemplate:Test3
Question: Is polygamy sexist?
| This page is still under construction. We welcome any suggestions for improving the content of this FAIR Answers Wiki page. |
Introduction to Question
Many assert that Latter-day Saint polygamy is sexist. This perspective has been promoted in many feminist Latter-day Saint circles and troubles many women today.
It is claimed that the historical practice of polygamy by The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints as well as some of the theology about celestial polygamy is sexist. This has been most passionately argued by Latter-day Saint poet Carol Lynn Pearson in her book The Ghost of Eternal Polygamy: Haunting the Hearts and Heaven of Mormon Women and Men.[1]
Notes
- ↑ Carol Lynn Pearson, The Ghost of Eternal Polygamy: Haunting the Hearts and Heaven of Mormon Women and Men (Walnut Creek, CA: Pivot Point Books, 2016). For reviews that expose the weaknesses of Pearson’s position and approach, see Allen Wyatt, “Scary Ghost Stories in the Light of Day,” Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 23 (2017): 137-160; Brian C. Hales, “Opportunity Lost,” Interpreter: A Journal of Latter-day Saint Faith and Scholarship 23 (2017): 91-109.