![FairMormon Logo](https://www.fairlatterdaysaints.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/01/2021_fair_logo_primary.png)
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
< Book of Mormon | Lamanites
GeorgeCobabe (talk | contribs) (→LGT theory and the D&C) |
m (→LGT theory and the D&C) |
||
Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
===LGT theory and the D&C=== | ===LGT theory and the D&C=== | ||
− | The LGT is not a doctrine of the Church and there is no necessity to accept it as the only interpretation of the Book of Mormon text. | + | The LGT is not a doctrine of the Church and there is no necessity to accept it as the only interpretation of the Book of Mormon text. Those who accept the LGT view it as the only theory that is consistent with the geographic descriptions and distances found in the Book of Mormon. The truth of the Book of Mormon does not depend, however, on proving or supporting the LGT. |
The LGT assumes that a small number of Lehites were introduced into a larger "sea" of native peoples, most of whom were of presumably Asiatic origin. Critics mistake the use of the term "Lamanite" as requiring descent from Lehi. But, from very early in the Book of Mormon record, it is clear that the term "Lamanite" does not refer to descent, but to political and religious affiliation: | The LGT assumes that a small number of Lehites were introduced into a larger "sea" of native peoples, most of whom were of presumably Asiatic origin. Critics mistake the use of the term "Lamanite" as requiring descent from Lehi. But, from very early in the Book of Mormon record, it is clear that the term "Lamanite" does not refer to descent, but to political and religious affiliation: |
| |||||||||
|
This page is based on an answer to a question submitted to the FAIR web site, or a frequently asked question.
Since in the Doctrine and Covenants God refers to American Indians in North America as "Lamanites" (e.g., DC 28꞉8-9,14, DC 30꞉6, DC 32꞉2,DC 54꞉8) does this cause problems for the Limited Geography Theory (LGT) or issues of Amerindian genetic data?
The LGT is not a doctrine of the Church and there is no necessity to accept it as the only interpretation of the Book of Mormon text. Those who accept the LGT view it as the only theory that is consistent with the geographic descriptions and distances found in the Book of Mormon. The truth of the Book of Mormon does not depend, however, on proving or supporting the LGT.
The LGT assumes that a small number of Lehites were introduced into a larger "sea" of native peoples, most of whom were of presumably Asiatic origin. Critics mistake the use of the term "Lamanite" as requiring descent from Lehi. But, from very early in the Book of Mormon record, it is clear that the term "Lamanite" does not refer to descent, but to political and religious affiliation:
So, any person who wasn’t a Nephite was, by exclusion, a Lamanite. Lamanites were not confined in any geographic sense at all. The LGT holds that the story of the Book of Mormon and the peoples with which it is concerned were confined to a narrow region, since this is all the area with which the authors of the Book of Mormon were directly concerned. Yet the Book of Mormon has several references that suggest a knowledge and interaction with a much greater geographical area. The story of Hagoth found in Alma 63 speaks not only of the shipbuilder and his movements northward (out of the general area referred to in the Book of Mormon) but also others that migrated to the north. In Helaman 3 we find other references to people migrating to the north;
The migration was out of the general area of the Book of Mormon story and is referred to as "an exceedingly great distance." This gives opportunity for Lamanites and Nephites to be found in all parts of the western hemisphere. There is no reason to believe that similar migrations would have occured to the south. Migrations to both the north and to the south were likely more common that is recorded in the text.
The situation in the 19th century was different than the state of affairs a millenium and a half earlier, when the Book of Mormon was written (i.e., about 400 AD at the latest). By Joseph Smith’s era, if Lehi left any descendants at all, then every single person in the hemisphere was a descendant of Lehi. (For further information about the population genetics, see FAIR Wiki article on Amerindians as Lamanites, especially all modern Amerindians from Lehi.)
This doesn’t mean that they got the majority of their DNA from him, or that one would likely be so spectacularly lucky as to find a genetic marker from him—but, they would be literal descendants to some degree, and yet would likely have predominantly Asian DNA markers.
We must not make the mistake of assuming that D&C revelations in which Joseph Smith speaks in “God’s voice” are to be seen as direct “quotations” from God. Joseph didn’t claim to be hearing a voice, and he didn’t claim to be quoting God or taking dictation. Rather, impressions would come to him, which he would put into words. Joseph clearly did not consider them “direct quotations” from God, since he was quite happy to revise them, edit them later, etc. This would be strange if Joseph saw them as “direct quotes,” not so strange when we understand how he saw the matter.
Many members of the Church assume differently because of the way they’re worded.
By the time the Doctrine and Covenants was written, Lehi's descendants had ample time to migrate and intermarry with the large number of "natives" postulated by the LGT. Such descendants are "Lamanites" in at least three senses:
Jump to details:
DNA FairMormon articles on-line |
D&C FairMormon articles on-line |
DNA on-line articles |
DNA printed materials |
FAIR is a non-profit organization dedicated to providing well-documented answers to criticisms of the doctrine, practice, and history of The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints.
We are a volunteer organization. We invite you to give back.
Donate Now